Failing to produce a model that can rival China's DeepSeek for efficiency, OpenAI is pleading for the government to step in.
  • febra@lemmy.worldEnglish
    33·
    8 hours ago

    Capitalists the moment the free market™️ no longer works for them: “I love state intervention!”

  • piskertariot@lemmy.worldEnglish
    591·
    16 hours ago

    The USA wants a world where AI wants is given permission to consume all copyrighted content for free, but we are charged for access to scholarly papers.

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.worldEnglish
    77·
    17 hours ago

    AI models trained on public information should be open sourced and publicly available.

    Billionaire’s should not own this behind closed doors.

    • Apricot@lemm.eeEnglish
      23·
      14 hours ago

      Silicon Valley is just a scam. They’ve made billions off selling your data, and selling targeted ads with your own data to be shoved back into your face. Social media has ruined society. Every “innovation” has been some way of stealing from you, whether it’s your data, your attention, or now, the entirety of documented humanity.

      /end yelling at clouds

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldEnglish
    16·
    17 hours ago

    They should probably just focus on their products. They introduced so much ‘guardrailing’ into their product its practically useless. Beyond that, there is a crap ton that can be done with the current crop. There are no guarantee’s of a technical moat and we don’t know where the next advance will come from.

    I mean hell, google slept on transformers after creating them in the first place and ended up scooped by OpenAI’s team. So who knows.

    But good product, good UI, no BS, no gimmicks, that sells. If OpenAI is that company, I’ll bite. If they arent, I shop with my feet.

    One example of a product I would buy right now. I give the agent/ system my shitty sloppy demo code in a ipython notebook. Its shitty, but it works. Maybe I have to give it an example of what “correct” output needs to look like.

    And then… I walk the fuck away. And in an hour (or two, I don’t give a shit), and my demo research code has been committed to a production ready git.

    Instead they are doing, whatever the fuck they think they are doing with “Deep Research”, which, as of every use I’ve tried to make of it. Its completely worthless.

      • Dran@lemmy.worldEnglish
        242·
        16 hours ago

        “Open source” in ML is a really bad description for what it is. “Free binary with a bit of metadata” would be more accurate. The code used to create deepseek is not open source, nor is the training datasets. 99% of “open source” models are this way. The only interesting part of the open sourcing is the architecture used to run the models, as it lends a lot of insight into the training process, and allows for derivatives via post-training

      • Tony Bark@pawb.socialEnglish
        12·
        16 hours ago

        Yes, and no. Yes in that they’ve released the research papers, pretrained parameters and weights of the model itself. Which is more than I can say for “OpenAI.” But no in that it doesn’t include training data or other critical components. Luckily, they’ve shown how they did it which makes it easy for anyone else to reverse engineer the process. That’s what Altman is afraid of.