• dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess it wouldn’t be hard to carefully unwrap it and then put the soaped ice cream back in the wrapper. I don’t think an office food thief will be too observant.

  • lunaticneko@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hate how it is illegal in American laws to defend yourself from thieves in some cases. The liability concept is weird.

  • LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Would be interesting for parents with kids that keep sneaking treats from the freezer despite multiple warnings…

  • JayleneSlide@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    My coworker and I made our own Sriracha and kept a bottle in the work fridge. It was labeled and dated. The lunchroom thief was raiding our Sriracha, which was no big deal in and of itself. The dick move was that this person would make a mess on the outside of the bottle and not wipe it off. So we put some one million SHU capsaicin extract in the bottle, which we enjoy, but melts the face on most people who aren’t dumbasses like us.

    Total fail: it turned out the thief also preferred the hotter sauce.

  • Kerb@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    im almost dissapointed, that this hasnt been an issue yet where i work.

    i like (by european standarts at least)
    rather spicy food.

    it would certainly be entertaining if somebody where to steal the wrong lunch from me.

    • Deuces@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do be careful. In the US (and I’d imagine must of Europe, but don’t know) it is illegal to boobytrap. Which (again US) has been upheld up include putting knowing harmful ingredients in food you expected to get stolen. Spicy food you intend to eat yourself is fine, but spicy food you don’t intend to eat yourself may go over the line.

      • jungle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        How is spicy food a boobytrap?

        Also, as much as I dislike spicy food myself, how is it harmful? Are all Mexican restaurants illegal?

      • Kerb@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        of course id only bring food that i intend to eat,
        im far to gluttonous to waste food on a prank.

        i just naturally eat food that is far more spicy than what my coworkers could handle.

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        For someone to actually be harmed from biting into soap, they’d have to actually swallow it. I’d think nobody in their right mind would actually swallow soap, unless by chance they don’t have a sense of taste and smell.

      • sunbunman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        How TF is this not legal? It’s meant to be your own food. If you want to eat soap, then no-one should be able to tell you otherwise.

        • slazer2au@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because it is food poisoning. Yes, them stealing food is illegal but so is poisoning food knowing someone will eat it. This is not one of those situations where one person is wrong so the other must be right. This is one of those situations where both people are assholes.

            • Sentrovasi@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That may be so, but booby-trapping is explicitly illegal in many countries because it basically means an intention to harm somebody else without caring about who the person might be.

                • Sentrovasi@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re begging to differ to someone who’s explaining why this is illegal. We all already know thievery is illegal. Your distinction doesn’t make any sense if you’re not disputing the principle behind its illegality here.

              • QuinceDaPence@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You think out of 12 jurors you wouldn’t have at least one nullify? They don’t even have to know what nullification is.

                • Sentrovasi@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Just maybe all twelve of them understood that the purpose of the jury is to settle matters of fact, not matters of law, and found that yes, you did actually put soap in chocolate hoping someone else would eat it.

          • sunbunman@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I guess depends on how they define “poison” in the legal sense. I know that most soaps aren’t toxic unless you have it regularly for a while. But I would argue the same for most fast food.

              • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                You would have to prosecute both to make the charge stick. The only way to discover food tampering would be the stealing of the food.

                Also there are perfectly legal modifications that are dickish but don’t constitute tapering. If the ingredients are normally edible without adverse effects, it isn’t tampering. You are allowed to dump a bottle of hot sauce into your coffee creamer. You can absolutely add salt instead of sugar to your homemade pie. You can bring a bottle of Gatorade that has been emptied and refilled with lemon juice.

                You can’t add laxatives or NYQUIL or other items to booby trap your food. Basically you’re not allowed to effect someone’s health with drugs or things that aren’t food

                • Deuces@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What if the theif turns out to be allergic to hot sauce? Like yeah I didn’t mean to seriously harm them, but I was boobytrapping the food with the expectation of causing some amount of harm. If they sue for the medical bills I’m pretty sure I’m gonna have to pay them and if they press charges I can see that going very bad for me

        • Alteon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Because your intentionally tampering with food which is felony. You get a 15 second laugh, and then the person you pranked can turn around and get you sent a prison for up to 15 years and $10,000 in fines.

          Sure, they deserved it, but it ain’t worth going to prison over.

          Edit: Okay, am I getting downvoted because I’m wrong, or because you guys just don’t like the answer?