• tuff_wizard@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah but why would facebook/x bother to check? Engagement is engagement. They already know there are millions of bots and don’t care.

    • Tanoh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 days ago

      My guess: it is a low hanging fruit and then they can say “Look! We blocked X million bots! So you can trust the users that are left… please don’t look into it any more”

      • tuff_wizard@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        No that’s why they never release any data about bots. That way they can pretend every account is a real user.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      because people used to do this all the time with ads: serve up an ad click, get paid… so spin up a bunch of clients and have them click ads on your site, easy money!

    • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      shareholders want real users, not bots. Facebook has to tell shareholders that real eyeballs are looking at ads, not virtual ones. Facebook is an adtech company—all tech they develop further establishes their advertisement empire, if advertisers (or more specifically, investors) find out ads on facebook aren’t worth their value, then facebook dies.

      • tuff_wizard@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Absolutely but so does reddit, they all make a great effort to not notice bot accounts.

        It would be easy to identity many bots by their browsing habits and other digital markers but they obfuscate all data that may give an indication of real users because, as you say, any drop in reported users is a drop in ad value.