Tlaloc_Temporal

Seems clickbaity to me. Lots of calls to action, burying the lead, and inflammatory language. Smells like rhetoric that we already are fighting against.

It feels like a persecution complex. “They hate us because we’re better, and they’ll always hate us! So keep doing what they hate! (And give us money)”

Lunch? Even better!

Those shadows also suggest the sun is on the ship.

And the small text on the bottle is screwy.

And the ship’s title is way sharper than the blurry lower resolution deck below it.

EVs don’t need to beat petrol vehicles in every way, in the same way that a sedan doesn’t have to beat a minivan, or a laptop doesn’t need to beat a smartphone.

a) EVs are getting relatively cheaper every year, while all vehicles are getting more expensive. b) They have range far in excess of what 90% of people use in a day. c) You can rent a vehicles for road trips if you really want to drive non-stop for dozens of hours at a time. d) Cold weather range isn’t too bad, and batteries usually condition themselves now. EV’s have a cold weather advantage in that they don’t need to idle for 10-15 minutes to prevent danage to the engine. e) Charging infrastructure is already ubiquitous, you can plug them into any electrical outlet and charge dozens of kilometers overnight. That’s zero fill-up time. Most residential parking infrastructure already has available plugs for block heaters and such, basically only street parking would ve annoying here. If you regularly drive more than dozens of kilometers in a day, you can get a larger charging plug from residential circuits, like clothes driers and ovens use, for a few hundred dollars, and all but guarantee a full charge every night. f) All else being equal EVs have better torque for towing, and unless the trailer is a giant billboard they don’t effect highway efficiency too much. Most importantly, 90% of people never tow anything.

EVs have different strengths and weaknesses to petrol vehicles, and the millions of people who commute under 40 miles a day would find an EV cheaper and easier to own. EVs have many of the same weakness as petrol vehicles however, and insisting they have to fill the same niches makes that worse. You don’t need to be reliant on fill stations, or have gigantic vehicles. EVs are best for smaller vehicles anyway, and smaller vehicles are better for roads and people’s safety.

That would instantly kill 80+% of bicycling for transportation in North America. I literally couldn’t even leave my house on my bike, and the pathway I use every day specifically designed for bicycle access to capmus would be useless, at it only connects to sidewalks.

Unfortunately, that’s limited to a single language, not international friendly. Having language at all makes it take longer to process too, but that’s not as much of an issue in this case.

Memes can be propaganda, yes, but they need to be something more, otherwise they won’t reach people.

You can make an image macro of a cat with the text “cucumber bad”, but it probably won’t be very popular. Even then, there’s a history of memes about cats reacting to cucumbers that gives that idea more traction than “Nazis did a nazi”.

Someone asked “why the downvotes”. I explained “bad meme”.

Didn’t know MSN was a meme site

Doesn’t matter. This isn’t a joke, it’s “group does a thing”. There’s no humor.

It’s getting downvotes because it’s not a meme. Even if it’s true, it’s just limp propaganda.

Would it? All the cars might just choose to take one of the turning lanes and leave the other half barren.

Hopefully they keep the repairability, unlike Apple.

If the loss of assets is enough to prevent you from considering the position, I don’t want you in that position. The PM is supposed to make decisions good for Canada, not their assets in particular.

That’s giving Russia a bit too much credit.

We should be starting domestic manufacturing that just does x amount of rail each year. Fully funded, doesn’t matter where, just pick a place and go.

I think more important would be non-chaotic answers. It doesn’t matter too much if their not identical if the content is roughly the same. But if you can get significantly different answers from trivial changes in prompt wording, that really does break things.

Still doesn’t mean it’s correct though.

Especially the LED backlight ones. Those are so bright they blind you, then switch brightness rapidly.

1 in 7 means lots of friend groups just don’t have players. It’s very likely that many children will grow up without really knowing what roblox is.

There’s no way it has 100% market penetration.