

But do they make a loss?
Creation isn’t always about maximizing cashflows.


But do they make a loss?
Creation isn’t always about maximizing cashflows.


Well we know what names they’d get in the USA.
Edit: Trump1, Trumps son, King trump etc


You can do it for free in your mind and they can’t stop you.
And then the writer just pulled the most unimaginative deus ex machina and the hero just “comes back” from the dead, pff lazy writing.
I’m so happy I jumped ship and upgraded my 2 mains to 32GB one, two years ago.
I could probably live on 8, 16 would be totally ok but now I’m “future proof”. For some time I bet, at least on my linux. Windows 13 will probably need 64GB just to boot.
Kids only got 16 though 😰


As it contains cheese!


Kfkt var fvcffd


I see it quite likely 😁
The Russian state budget is under enormous strain alteady, oil prices plummeting, wealthfund almost used up to prop up last years budget, “war economy” down…
I mean if they continue like this it’ll be 1991 all over again lol.
Yeah those bones are not normal lol 😂


As long as it isn’t your health app…
Yeah the dark pattern (ability to pay for “fun” / no “fun” if you don’t pay) is so bullshit. Usually they build the whole game around it too, like in your example.
Ha ha wasn’t it that one like text only, often in poems, and meat was the money?
Except that’s a dark pattern, taking away the “fun” and letting you have it if you pay. Those games were slow, no way around it. Quite the opposite IMO.
You’d also spend too much time on forums, planning the next excursion and so on.
I understand the urge, but those games were not pay to play. Making each action quite important, like if you die in battle you might have to walk for two weeks to catch up with your group, or if a teleporter helped you out you could get there in 3…
“Are you here for the 5 or 15 minutes argument?”
.montepython
Mebbe it’s soon time to go home?!!
Is the text “it’s not gonna suck itself”?