Oh, it was all computer data. Originals, copies, it all has the same information in it. Chain of custody would matter in a trial, but not to the general public. And you think nobody kept copies as CYA material? Nobody? Fat chance. We know the TLAs are full of power hungry career creeps. They know how to keep data safe for future use.
To be clear, this was always the law. Also, ACAB.
Your premise is wrong. The Democrats never had the list, and the Republicans don’t have it now. The people who actually have that list, and those documents, have names. Use those names. Don’t trick yourself into believing that some random congressperson has access or authority.
By definition those are not 1-in-1000. They were, but no longer.
Lol read the news already. MAGA is pissed off at him for this entire issue.
The video footage was doctored. Maybe innocuously, maybe not, but the files that were supposed to be the originals had been edited multiple times with Adobe software.
See other posts for articles detailing this. It’s easy enough to confirm. (That alone doesn’t prove extreme badness, but it does prove intent to deceive the public, as if we needed more.)
He’s not criticizing the country. He’s criticizing the military and the political leadership. There’s a very big difference between the two. It’s actually a major issue in bad political reporting that people will conflate those entirely distinct entities.
At many companies you talk to more than one person in a single visit, so when that person writes about interviews, the plural, it’s likely that they’re planning to have you speak with multiple people.
Everything depends on the company, but if you’re going in for a multi-hour session, you’re probably on the short list of candidates. So you should feel good about where you are, but you don’t have the job yet.
That’s what Hillary said. That’s what Harris said. They lost, you’re lost, and it’s sad that you don’t understand why.
In reality we have a lot of political power. We don’t just choose from the options that magically appear in front of u in cute binary packages. That’s not what happens every day of our lives.
I see you are not a lawyer. Neither am I. But I have learned that in many countries, a guilty verdict could be tossed out by the judge if the pigs’ actions were bad enough. You can also get jury nullification, if you’re lucky.
And sometimes it turns out the officers actually fucked shit up before or after the video, which might only be uncovered before or during trial. Depends on the details.
All of those possibilities go to zero if you plead out.
You could have used ad blockers. You could have done any number of things. You were not forced to use YouTube as it is. But I understand … It is hard to recognize that we actively consume media. It is hard to think from perspective.
Alligator Auschwitz. It’s a death camp, or will soon be.
Electric kettles are a waste of space for many people. Limited use, fills up the counter. So then either you use the store or the microwave. We both know which one is faster.
If you’re renting, maybe it’s not your problem. The landlords jack us for rent, so we mess with their drains. Meh.
Should we respect our landlords, you might ask? That depends on them. Respect is earned.
I think you’re wrong about religion. You’re trying to say that religion is used as justification afterwards, but we know that real numbers of religious nuts will endorse horrible things because of their religious beliefs.
In other words, would there be less violence occurring in that region if nobody had any religious beliefs? I think the answer has to be “probably yes”. We know this by talking to people, by looking at religious zealots throughout history. But even if our logic is correct, we cannot accurately guess how much less violence would be occurring if the region were full of atheists.
And in some sense our counterfactual thought experiment doesn’t even matter because the reality is that region is of great religious significance and you can’t really write that off as being irrelevant when several millennia prove that it is.
I wouldn’t say it’s banal, though. It’s pretty aggressively evil. And you write about “eventually genocide”, when ethnic cleansing efforts are well underway already.
Unfortunately, the term “antisemitic” no longer has any kind of fixed meaning. I wish that weren’t true, and I think it’s a combination of forces that decided to misuse the word for several decades, that have now led to it being meaningless.
And you might be tempted to tell me what you think it means, and maybe I could agree with you, but when I turn on the TV tomorrow someone else will be using it in a totally different way that’s inconsistent. Actually I’m kidding. I don’t have a TV.
Honestly, did you look at any of the pictures? You think people with delicate health conditions should be sent there? Really?
Also, I’m assuming you’re genuine, but there are many people who post similar comments, things like “All lives matter.” And yes, human life is worth respect, but at the same time, you don’t want to be confused with a bigoted troll.
Call it what it is: a concentration camp, a death camp, or perhaps Alligator Auschwitz.
Alcatraz housed convicted felons. This place is housing non-criminals. Immigration is a civil infraction, like a parking ticket. If you ever stole something from the store or got in a fight, you’re more of a criminal than these folks.
That all depends on the people. Many numbers in many places are far better than they were three decades ago. I could make a list, but so can you, so why bother.