Though hopefully they are only falling out of love with big tech social media, as I’d love to see the Fediverse thrive.

A lot of pubs in the UK do serve food, and often they have provisions for families including changing tables and high chairs.

I think it depends on the context, if it was the only pub in a small village, you’d want it to be inclusive as possible. However, in a big city like London, there are lots of pubs, and if one isn’t child-friendly, there’s plenty of others that are, and vice versa.

Men don’t even have to be tested, according to the article:

Male athletes need not complete a test in order to compete.

I used to refer to the Marine Conservation Society’s Good Fish Guide on the odd occasion I’d eat fish. Back then I remember mackerel being sustainable, sadly that is no longer the case as the guide for mackerel now says:

Most mackerel sold in the UK needs improvement because of long-term overfishing. Avoid mackerel caught using gillnets.

You could make the community local only, but that would very much limit its reach.

Though how do you ban a user who’s only downvoted in a community? From what I can tell, the ban option only appears on posts and comments.

Once a moderator has viewed the votes, and identified a downvote spammer, what happens next? Is it possible to ban a user from a community just for downvote spamming?

I’ve been using frp to create a reverse proxy between my NAS at home and a DigitalOcean droplet. Been using it for over a year now, and not had any issues.

Some people, myself included, like the taste and ritual of drinking beer, but don’t want to get drunk.

The article does say that income is a factor:

Income also plays a role, with people living in more deprived areas tending to drink less than their more affluent neighbours.

Unless there is a future need for all this milk, or an argument for food security, couldn’t the government incentivize the farmers to grow different crops, or even rewild their farmlands?

In terms of strategies, I’d recommend Unmasked by Ellie Middleton.

I’m currently half way through reading Scattered Minds by Gabor Maté, which is very much worthy of all the praise it receives.

The Ministry of Defence has also signed a £240 million contract with Palantir, the biggest ever UK defence deal.

That was my original point. The artist or promoter is able to set the face value price, but Ticketmaster adds fees on top.

Do you have a source for this? The Ticketmaster FAQ states the artist or promoter sets the base price.

The article states that the government will regulate the fees that can be charged on top of the face value.

Under the plan, which could form part of next year’s King’s speech, anyone selling a ticket will not be allowed to charge more than they paid for it. Resale platforms will be allowed to charge fees on top of that price. These extras will also be limited, to ensure that they can’t be inflated artificially to offset profits forfeited owing to the legislation. The scale of the ceiling on service fees is yet to be determined.

Isn’t it the artist or promoter who set the face value price?

That’s depends, what’s your primary mode of travel?

I can’t find any mention of them using neurodiversity as a defence in the article, nor the press release by Just Up Oil.