• hoodatninja@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean I’m not that extreme lmao that’s also a safety issue. Kids will be kids, they will not sit quietly all school day and be total lesson sponges lol

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      How much of a safety issue would it really be? Cell phones didn’t really become a thing for my age range until high school. If there was an emergency, there was a landline in the classrooms.

      • justhach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right? Somehow schools survived until at least the 2010s without every kid having a cellphone in them at all times.

        • someguy3@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No kidding. Not to sound like an old fogey but we did really well without them for both “emergencies” and “fact checking”. I can only see them primarily as a distraction.

        • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, it would suck for the staff, but I don’t think it would be that much more unsafe. I don’t think it’s a good idea, but I don’t think it’s particularly unsafe.

        • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ban pocket calculators because the abacus exists. Lazy kids aren’t learning how to do arithmetic because of them.

          • someguy3@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Those were tools. Smart phones are a distraction for social media 99% of the time.

              • someguy3@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I already did unpack it: “Smart phones are a distraction for social media 99% of the time.”

                Nor did I say the word “just”. You’re both ignoring what I did say and inserting your own words. They can be distractions with you know social media. But also back in my day they taught us Word, Excel, programming. You had a class with that. You didn’t need it in your pocket 24/7.

                  • someguy3@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yes you can find a way to goof off in any class instead of doing your work. Isn’t that the whole point of this discussion? To remove ways to goof off, you know, smartphones. Ban them in class. And just like you can catch people playing video games in computer class, you can catch people using their phone in class. Just because some people will break rules doesn’t mean we throw our hands up and say ok then no rules.

                    You’re really comparing this to teaching abstinence? Wow. And then you rage against something as basic as rules, blaming rules for what seems like everything you think is bad. Ok then. Cheers.

      • hoodatninja@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t think y’all realize that not a single staff member or administrator or any employee of the school would be able to use a phone either (other than landlines I guess?). Schools aren’t just full of students lol

        • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          other than landlines I guess?

          You mean that thing I specifically mentioned? Yes, I realize that. Would it be inconvenient? Yes, it absolutely would. Would it suck to work in that environment? Again, yes it would. If I’m just thinking about safety, I’m not sure it’s that much more unsafe.

          • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            School shootings weren’t really a thing until after you graduated you dumb fucking boomer.

            Things change, and I’m tired of stupid trogladites inhibiting innovation because it’s different than what they’re used to.

            Get with the times, or move the fuck out of the way.

            • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m not a boomer. And I’m in no way advocating the use of a Faraday cage. Maybe read what is actually written instead of what you think was written. Hell I work in tech trying to get people up with the times…

            • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s incredibly unsafe when you live in a society built around smartphones/tablets for health and safety tools to remove said smartphones.

              But is it? Landlines can make the same emergency calls. A Faraday cage also doesn’t mean you can’t have an internal wifi that reaches outside that the staff can connect to, or even the students can connect through with a proxy controlling their connection.

              I agree it’s impractical. But it doesn’t mean laptops and phones suddenly don’t work. They can still work within the cage and you can poke holes through it with a landline and a proxy to control traffic in and out.

              Ultimately, it’s definitely not worth the engineering and the effort. I just don’t think that safety is the reason it is impractical.

    • ridethisbike@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, but the attention span kids have these days seem to be shortening. Phones and the current state of social media intake doesn’t help.

      That said, a faraday cage is absolutely too far, but they don’t need their phones when they should be focusing on the course.

      • hoodatninja@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, but the attention span kids have these days seem to be shortening.

        I hear this a lot but have yet to see evidence/sources from anyone. It’s just “look around you.” I don’t find it particularly compelling. I didn’t exactly sit quietly as a kid myself.

          • hoodatninja@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That appears to be a quickly referenced theory by one (yes qualified) person on one blog post without a study behind it. I could also argue that kids generally have short attention spans but social media just allows them to indulge in it more, and they will of course prioritize attention to that over other things. That is not the same as “it shortens their attention spans.” We need at least one study here or at least something more substantive than a one-liner linking social media and decreasing ones attention span. I’m not sure if you noticed, but blog is actually focusing on how to reach kids and strategies to get them to pay attention. It has one throw away non-cited line about social media shortening attention spans.

            I should also point out that I also did a cursory Google search before writing the previous comment, and that was the only post I saw as well. The reason you selected it is because there was no other decent hit when you searched I imagine.

            Let me be clear here, the only reason I am sort of arguing about this is because there is a really bad propensity for older people to say something is wrong with younger people. We see it over and over again. I think social media is actually very harmful to kids, but I have yet to see anything that shows it actually diminishes ones attention span. And the reason I really don’t like that claim is because it seems to be just another variation of “kids these days.”

    • Mudface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of course not, but I think we should at least act as if they should.

      Knowing it’s not possible, though.

      My kids are in 5th, 3rd and 1st grade. I wouldn’t want them on their phones during class as they grow up.