• YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Legality offers a closer shot to morality than religious doctrine by a country mile.

    • Tinks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would argue that’s not necessarily the case - see slavery, caste systems, discrimination etc. In many countries currently and throughout history it’s been perfectly legal to treat the “other” as less than oneself, even up to and including murder and torture.

      Also, often laws are created to enforce religious doctrine, which while perhaps morally preferable to those of that religion may be abhorrent to those outside it. (Abortion, burkas/hijab, education restrictions, prison sentencing, drug/alcohol legality, etc)

      • YeetPics@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ask yourself which is more likely to have a special set of rules for the “out group” between state laws and religious denominations.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a lot of law protecting immorality/punishing moral actions as well. Look at how difficult it is for people to get justice through the legal system in so many cases. It can take years fighting corporations lawyers before they’re paid damages.

    • June@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s only if the people writing the law have a moral compass of one sort (religious or not).

      If I become ruler and write the law so that helping the poor is criminal, the only solution to a person unable to pay their debt is death, and that only people of a certain demographic are allowed to use front doors to establishments I don’t think you’d say that the law is a closer shot to morality than religious doctrine.