GrappleHat@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 年前Google loses antitrust case vs Epic Games. Jury rules Google Play store constitutes an illegal monopolywww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square35linkfedilinkarrow-up1180arrow-down13 cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldgames@sh.itjust.worksandroid@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1177arrow-down1external-linkGoogle loses antitrust case vs Epic Games. Jury rules Google Play store constitutes an illegal monopolywww.theverge.comGrappleHat@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 年前message-square35linkfedilink cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldgames@sh.itjust.worksandroid@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squarebionicjoey@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·3 年前How exactly does a jury trial work in a case like this? Aren’t juries supposed to be “peers” of the accused? How can a corporation be tried by a jury of its peers?
How exactly does a jury trial work in a case like this? Aren’t juries supposed to be “peers” of the accused? How can a corporation be tried by a jury of its peers?
In the US, corporations are people
Yeah but who are their peers?
deleted
Going off history, fascist dictators.