A lawsuit launched by far-right fanatic and mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik accusing the state of abusing his human rights has opened in Norway.
Breivik, who killed 77 people in a bombing and shooting rampage in 2011, appeared in a court set up in the high-security jail in which he is serving his sentence on Monday. By accusing Norway’s Ministry of Justice of breaching his human rights, he hopes to force the authorities to end his years in isolation.
The 44-year-old killer’s lawyer laid out an argument that the conditions of his detention violated his human rights.
“He has been isolated for about 12 years,” Oeystein Storrvik told the hearing. “He is only in contact with professionals, not with other inmates.”
In earlier court filings, Storrvik had argued the isolation had left Breivik suicidal and dependent on the anti-depression medication Prozac.
Breivik claims the isolation he has faced since he started serving his prison sentence in 2012 amounts to inhumane punishment under the European Convention on Human Rights. He failed in a similar attempt in 2016 -17, when his appeal was denied by the European Court of Justice.
The extremist, who distributed copies of a manifesto before his attack, is suing the state and also asking the court to lift restrictions on his correspondence with the outside world.
He killed eight people with a car bomb in Oslo then gunned down 69 others, most of them teenagers, at a Labour Party youth camp. It was Norway’s worst peacetime atrocity.
Breivik spends his time in a dedicated section of Ringerike prison, the third prison in which he has been held. His separated section includes a training room, a kitchen, a TV room and a bathroom, pictures from a visit last month by news agency NTB showed.
He is allowed to keep three budgerigars as pets and let them fly freely in the area, NTB reported.
People like him are why Norway’s system is immoral.
It’s immoral to tell a community they owe something to someone actively trying to destroy it. The community is allowed to put its best interests above threats to it, and that is the only moral mindset.
The garbage people spew to justify letting Norway harm everyone else by essentially enabling this scumbag is simply immoral, and always has been.
Hi, Norwegian here. Care to explain what you’re talking about? This country is far from perfect but your rhetoric is confusing and feels a little undeserved.
It’s obvious what I am talking about and your attitude is therefore clearly disingenuous and in bad faith, but you can go ahead, take the last word and play dumb for internet points if you want. I don’t have time for your shit today.
Ok. Or you could answer my question instead of assuming I’m being disingenuous for wanting to understand you. If this is how you act towards people simply for asking a question then block me.
And no, it’s not obvious. It’s not obvious at all.
What do you suggest? An execution?
Not giving angry disaffected people like you who get aggressive at the slightest hint of your precious sacred cow being questioned an audience, to start.
I wasn’t being aggressive, honestly. I tried to appear as calm as possible, but it looks like I failed.
That was a genuine question. What is the right thing to do in your opinion?