King@lemy.lol to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 8 months agoCrunchyrolllemy.lolimagemessage-square278fedilinkarrow-up1693arrow-down113file-text
arrow-up1680arrow-down1imageCrunchyrolllemy.lolKing@lemy.lol to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 8 months agomessage-square278fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareTWeaK@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoThe legal definition is THE definition, it’s literally what the word means, and where the concepts of both originate. What you’re saying isn’t irrelevant, it’s just completely ignorant and wrong.
minus-squareZoolander@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months agoThe legal definition is not the definition. That is just nonsense. There are an innumerable amount of terms that have a literary definition that is not the same as the legal definition.
minus-squareTWeaK@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoYou’re trying to say that your definition is the only valid one, which conveniently is one that your argument is entirely reliant upon. It isn’t valid, you’re wrong, your argument does not hold water.
The legal definition is THE definition, it’s literally what the word means, and where the concepts of both originate.
What you’re saying isn’t irrelevant, it’s just completely ignorant and wrong.
The legal definition is not the definition. That is just nonsense. There are an innumerable amount of terms that have a literary definition that is not the same as the legal definition.
You’re trying to say that your definition is the only valid one, which conveniently is one that your argument is entirely reliant upon.
It isn’t valid, you’re wrong, your argument does not hold water.