So you’re hoping judges will collectively reinterpret the definition of fair use under copyright law to exclude the training of AI models? Good luck with that lol
Also, most of your comments wouldn’t be considered copyrightable.
I’m not an authority on copyright, nor did I claim to be. I’m just aware of my surroundings.
And again, even if courts suddenly decide that training AI isn’t fair use, you don’t have to attach a license to your comments for it to apply. Content that you produce is copyrighted by default, with all rights reserved. You are exclusively giving away rights by attaching a CC license, not reserving them.
Cue the “OMG it’s so complicated!” comments by people who somehow managed to sign up to email, but this is suddenly too hard.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0!
Why? You realize that you reserve more rights by not including a license than by including one, right?
Multiple people on here have already tried to tell them.
AI
So you’re hoping judges will collectively reinterpret the definition of fair use under copyright law to exclude the training of AI models? Good luck with that lol
Also, most of your comments wouldn’t be considered copyrightable.
Are you a legal expert? Lawyer? Judge? What gives you any authority on copyright?
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
I’m not an authority on copyright, nor did I claim to be. I’m just aware of my surroundings.
And again, even if courts suddenly decide that training AI isn’t fair use, you don’t have to attach a license to your comments for it to apply. Content that you produce is copyrighted by default, with all rights reserved. You are exclusively giving away rights by attaching a CC license, not reserving them.
Didn’t read further than this. Your opinion is unimportant on the matter.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
You should reconsider that, because you are most definitely giving up many of your rights to your content.