“I’m literally dying of thirst. I can only pick from two glasses of water. One is poison and will definitely kill me. The other tastes bad and may give me the runs, but I’ll survive.”
“I have it! I’ll drink neither and wait as others pour the poison water down my throat for me!”
What’s your theory for why the voting ratio of this post is 20:1 in favor of “voting makes sense in this election”, and the ratio of the comments is like 1:1? Or do you just not think that’s odd?
I did. you’re claiming voting is pointless, but all abstaining can lead to is trump
I never said Trump would help me. So your question is irrelevant.
Your actions will help elect him. 2+2=4 whether you’re acknowledging it or not
Sounds like you’re exactly what I’ve been going on about this whole time. If you have nothing productive to say we’re done here.
Not voting is bad. Take a civics class or something
I’ve taken two. Try exploring exercises in reading comprehension.
“I’m literally dying of thirst. I can only pick from two glasses of water. One is poison and will definitely kill me. The other tastes bad and may give me the runs, but I’ll survive.”
“I have it! I’ll drink neither and wait as others pour the poison water down my throat for me!”
If you get the runs when dying of thirst it will kill you as sure as poison, you nit.
You’ve literally made my point for me.
Curious about this, maybe you can help me:
What’s your theory for why the voting ratio of this post is 20:1 in favor of “voting makes sense in this election”, and the ratio of the comments is like 1:1? Or do you just not think that’s odd?
I have my theory, but I’m curious what yours is.
Way to miss the point by nitpicking the nuances of the analogy that didn’t matter.