• Womble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Further to this its not likely to result in less children being abused.

    If you have the death penalty for even possessing CSAM as the parent suggests, then there is no incentive to not get into distribution or even actively abusing children and producing CSAM once you posess some. The punishment isnt any worse so why not? Its the same reason for proportionality in other crimes, we dont punish robbing a bank with life in jail as then there would be no reason for anyone who robs a bank to not just murder everyone to leave no witnessess.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      And if you propose the death penalty for abusing children, a child abuser has incentive to kill the child afterwards to get rid of the witness.
      The punishment can’t get any worse, and it reduces the chance of getting caught.