No more men’s and women’s league, no more “gender eligibility” requirements, a common dresscode, same standards and rules for all.

Edit: since it looks like people missing the word let: the suggestion isn’t to force desegregation. It’s to allow it or even make it the default. Someone else made a good suggestion: segregate by attributes specific to the sport. In boxing it’s weight class, in basketball it could be height, in biking it could even be doped and non doped. Sex and gender need not be the very first thing to segregate by.

  • atro_city@fedia.ioOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    Of course people are differently capable, that why we have divisions, leagues, weight classes, and so on, even in the same sex. Why would that change when they all compete together?

    • Lauchs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      “Hey! Do you want to watch division 7 soccer? They have a woman on the team!”

      Hardly inspirational to girls everywhere. Whereas whenever I’ve caught the Canadian women’s soccer team, it’s usually at a pretty full arena with lots of girls teams there stoked to watch. I would never take that away from them.

      • atro_city@fedia.ioOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        Why do you assume they’ll be in the 7th division? And do you assume it will be the case for all sports?

        • Lauchs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Which sports do you watch both men and women play?

          Soccer is the one I do most frequently. My local men’s MLS team would walk through the Canadian women’s team. The men can just kick it much farther and harder, run faster, take dangerous shots from farther out and that’s not to mention the physicality. And the Canadian women’s team is one of the top 10 or so in the world. (And MLS is several steps down from any of the serious leagues from which most national men’s teams are drawn.)

          Not even going to look at a more physical sport like hockey.

          I already posted comparing men and women’s times at the Olympics, but to reiterate, the gold winning woman came in slower than the bare minimum men’s time to qualify to run at the Olympics, in the 10k race, literally every one of the racers beat the women’s world record… (stats you saw but conveniently did not respond to.)

          Does that answer your question?

          • atro_city@fedia.ioOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Does that answer your question?

            No, it doesn’t answer if it’ll be the same for all sports. As others have pointed out archery, shooting, curling, and other sports have men an women competing either separate or together and women can compete at the same level.

            As for football, yes, there’s a good chance there’ll be stark differences, but as I pointed out in another comment, not every sport is about raw strength. And, competing against stronger opponents can also raise your ceiling. How far is of course yet to be seen because we don’t have mixed leagues.

            And again, the suggestion isn’t “NO MORE SEGREGATION EVER” it’s “should we let them compete against each other”. That means there’ll be a mixed and segregated league. Maybe even, as somebody else suggested, the segregations wouldn’t always be immediately by sex or gender, but by attributes that make sense in that sport e.g weight, muscle mass, height, skill, and so on.

            • Lauchs@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Your question blurb literally says “no more men and women’s leagues, no more gender requirements.”

              That is not compatible with segregated leagues.

              It really seems like you didn’t know that some sports men and women already play against each other and some they don’t and are now trying to argue for a bizzarely complex system rather than admit that hey, you hadn’t thought something through or you didn’t know something.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because putting them together in most physical sports would push women out of the highest echelons of that sport. Just look up what female MMA fighters and female tennis players have to say. They literally can’t keep up with men. Serena Williams and her sister boasted that they’d beat any man outside the top 200, Braasch (then #203) took the challenge and on the day of the challenge played a round of golf drank 2 low ABV beers before easily beating both sisters

      Probably the most detrimental thing you can do for women in sports is to get rid of the women’s league. Most “men’s” categories are already open for women, so you should ask women why they don’t want to partake. The answer is what female athletes already say, they’d get absolutely dumpstered before they even get close to the top. Of course the less physically demanding the closer men and women will be, but for most sports the physical differences make women’s leagues necessary.