• Khanzarate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    3 days ago

    I did the same thing. It was allowed in general, with the correct thought, “if you can code it yourself, you know the content”

    I had another “program” that would fail to run but that’s because I wrote notes into it. Doubt that was allowed.

      • piecat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Oh I would have been so pissed. I was programming on my calculator 24/7 instead of my classes.

        I wrote a sudoku “editor”

        I put that in quotes because I had a grid that could be navigated, arrows moved, storing the numbers, had number entry down. And when it was time to implement the solver, I learned the hard way what p vs np is.

      • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        They did that here too, but students would use a cheat program that made it look like teachers were resetting it, but really the memory was safe

        • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I don’t remember if they fully closed the loopholes, but there are inputs that programs cannot catch unless you actually replace the OS.

    • thejml@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I did that but made it return success before it got to the notes. You had to scroll to get to the notes, but it looked innocuous before that.