The Supreme Court on Tuesday overturned a lower court ruling from Pennsylvania that allowed residents under 21 to carry firearms in public, though the justices declined for now to hear arguments in the case themselves.
The key context is that this type of law in Wisconsin would have made it illegal for Kyle to not only purchase a firearm, but illegal to own/brandish/carry one.
Would it have stopped someone from illegally buying Kyle one or Kyle using it? No. But then he wouldn’t have gotten away with murder.
You may be short on reading comprehension, so the idea that a law in one state could have helped find justice in another is confusing to you. That’s okay.
The key context is that this type of law in Wisconsin would have made it illegal for Kyle to not only purchase a firearm, but illegal to own/brandish/carry one.
Would it have stopped someone from illegally buying Kyle one or Kyle using it? No. But then he wouldn’t have gotten away with murder.
Ok? You could play that game for any law with any crime.
If Wisconsin had a law making it illegal to cross state lines then he would have been stopped too.
You’re just saying “what if”. This has nothing to do with the Pennsylvania law.
Yes, you could play that game for many laws. One like this, specifically, could have helped Kyle face justice. That’s the point.
I bet it would have helped at the grassy knoll too!
Lmao okay reply guy!
Lol “haha look at you replying to messages! What a loser!”
Replying and adding to the conversation are two very different things, friendo. Lmao
Like bringing up a crime that didn’t happen anywhere near the state this entire post is about? Friendo Lmao
You may be short on reading comprehension, so the idea that a law in one state could have helped find justice in another is confusing to you. That’s okay.