A new poll suggests that Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein is drawing more voters from former President Donald Trump than from Vice President Kamala Harris.

According to a Noble Predictive Insights survey released last week, Harris holds a narrow lead over Trump in a hypothetical three-way race. With Stein on the ballot, Harris’ lead expands, pointing to a potential spoiler effect similar to what many Democrats blamed Stein for doing to Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.

For Trump, the emergence of Stein as a potential spoiler may be a critical factor in battleground states, where even a small shift in votes could determine the outcome. For Harris, Stein’s candidacy could paradoxically provide an unexpected advantage, drawing votes from Trump and narrowing his pathway to victory.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Do you think all of those people who have been saying that third-party voters are going to destroy the US will be apologizing in the comment section here?

    • vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      53 seconds ago

      It’s possible the warnings helped. No reason to apologise for that.

    • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      First past the post is a terrible design. Let’s rank choice and move on.

      lol, pie in the sky right?

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      56 minutes ago

      Regardless of outcome, you’re playing with fire in our current voting system. Even if a few states did actually elect a third party, you could see no candidate reach 270 electoral votes and then it goes to the even more arcane vote done in the house of representatives (which each state gets a vote)

      A very blue district in Hawaii sent a Republican (Charles Djou) to Washington in a special election with less than half the vote, because the two Democrats in the race refused to back down. If there were a ranked choice or other voting system than “plurality takes all”, he wouldn’t have won

      • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        Oh geez, really tightening up the narrative now. 3rd party voting in non-swing states is getting demonized.