• Machinist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Ehh. IDK if that would be bad or good for Linux. More choices against the possibility of weaker teams/poorer code. Even if things did fragment for a while, one version likely comes out on top and everyone migrates slowly back together.

    Interwebs and tech seems to route around this sort of thing.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Sure but tech has only existed during peaceful times. With the world splitting apart you can’t assume it we’ll be the same outcome.

    • basmati@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s better in the long term, free software and the political philosophy behind it is entirely incompatible with American political ideology or geopolitics generally. If everyone can contribute, everyone can benefit. When you start limiting this by arbitrary nonsensical reasoning due to legal obligations you only have because the founder of the foundation has a boner for an idealized America that never existed… Shit gets worse. From this many developers are going to permanently leave Linux development and a few may get petty enough to change their license to prevent use in Linux.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yah sure the guys who are paid to contribute to Linux are going to leave.

        • basmati@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yes, if enough principaled contributors leave, it’ll no longer make sense for companies to pay for people to contribute.