I use four monitors for my WFH setup with a total of 11.8m pixels. Three 6k monitors is 37.3m pixels, more than three times what I’ve got. I’d be seriously considering this if I could run all four, but for now the hackintosh lives on.
Honestly, even 3 isn’t enough at times and I’m not doing anything crazy. Mostly Chrome, Teams, WhatsApp (ugh), Outlook, and Excel (god, so much excel).
three 6k monitors is far from the realitty of 99,999999% of users
I use four monitors for my WFH setup with a total of 11.8m pixels. Three 6k monitors is 37.3m pixels, more than three times what I’ve got. I’d be seriously considering this if I could run all four, but for now the hackintosh lives on.
And? It’s clearly a feature for professionals. 3 4k monitors is currently a pain in the ass and does get used in business.
even for professionals is too much. Few ones needs three 6k monitor
Honestly, even 3 isn’t enough at times and I’m not doing anything crazy. Mostly Chrome, Teams, WhatsApp (ugh), Outlook, and Excel (god, so much excel).
Does your monitors have 6K resolution too?
So the new Mac Mini can do more than most people need for a cheaper price than most people would expect.
Sounds awesome!
And yet you’ve somehow run into someone provisioning similar setups on Lemmy. Maybe apple knows their use base better than you think.