• neatchee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    I see that you won’t even bother trying to address the initial point of my reply so I’m done here. I’m not trying to debate the merits of a case that never even went to trial, when the whole point of my reply was to simply point out that you were being outrageously hyperbolic

    Address the actual complaint or gtfo.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      You were the one trying to muddy the waters by saying there was “a lot to question about that plea agreement” and then going on to misrepresent the facts surrounding the corruption (such as falsely insisting that Schwarzenegger and Nunez weren’t actually political cronies), not me.

      • neatchee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It was a minor aside. It was very obviously not the primary point of my reply. You chose to fixate on it. And you continue to do so. Seriously done with you now, chief. 👋

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Just a casual, minor aside of throwing the credibility of the conviction itself into question and then the casual, minor aside of falsely suggesting they aren’t cronies. 💀

          I guess it’s harder for you to make the argument this wasn’t patently corrupt when I actually challenge you on falsehoods completely misconstruing the very nature of the corruption, huh? You’d prefer I just ignore those and let them slip by, which like I get. I’d prefer it too if every game of soccer I played had no opposing goalie, but you don’t need to be so transparently salty about wanting and failing to pilot the conversation away from pointing out your BS.

          • Jarix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Do you stand by YOUR comment on how crooked this is, or do you admit that you exaggerated how corrupt these people are conpared to the worst of people we know to have been corrupt?

            Just answering this question. A yes i exagerated or no this is actually as bad as corruption gets are great answers if you need examples to borrow

          • NoMoreCocaine@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            As an third party from different country who has no idea of the topic or people involved, all I have to say that from outside perspective you’re the “villain” in this conversation, so maybe chill out and consider things?

          • CasualPenguin@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Arnold absolutely sucks for what he did, I have long pointed to it as one example of why he shouldn’t be so glorified for not being completely insane as other Republicans.

            That said, the other poster you’re talking to is in the right here, you’re ignoring the point entirely.