• null@slrpnk.net
    1·
    8 hours ago

    Only by contradicting yourself.

    Prove it.

    None of those things are the same as concluding that voting for Kamala is tactically correct

    Define “tactically correct”.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      12·
      8 hours ago

      I’m getting an error of “max comment depth reached,” so it seems we’ll have to call it.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      13·
      8 hours ago

      Prove it.

      To denounce a candidate is to say that you shouldn’t vote for them. To vote for a candidate who you say doesn’t deserve a vote is self-contradiction.

      Define “tactically correct”.

      A tactically correct action is an action that best furthers your goals.

      • null@slrpnk.net
        21·
        8 hours ago

        To denounce a candidate is to say that you shouldn’t vote for them.

        Or you can vote against them.

        To vote for a candidate who you say doesn’t deserve a vote is self-contradiction.

        They deserve a vote solely for the reason that doing so is the only possible means of voting against the other candidate. It’s not a self-contradiction.

        A tactically correct action is an action that best furthers your goals.

        What are the goals in this scenario?