• jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    For the politically disengaged? It is an accurate take.

    In 2020, you had massive unemployment. People personally were stuck at home with nowhere they could go. Many of them saw a loved one suffer death at the hands of a pandemic, or personally get very sick. That is a direct and visceral experience of “things are bad”. They didn’t need to follow any news, study any charts, read any policy, they knew that their direct subjective experience was bad.

    In 2024, things for people are largely normal, but a lot of bills are high. Grading on a curve, this is much further from a personal crisis for most folks. In fact, the grocery bills eased a bit so some people might be seeing a natural ‘light at the end of the tunnel’.

    The biggest discused crisis factors in forums like this are only being considered by the politically engaged, and that’s just not most people. Whether it should be or not…

      • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yez, but not in the way you’re thinking. People have been radicalized by misogynists on youtube and tiktok that Russia has paid for. It’s been proven for some of them, and if you think they’re the only ones, you’re living in a fantasy land.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Unfortunately, I think the media has blared the things people should be caring like crazy. Problems remain:

        • People only internalize their personal experience, and they only care so much about what they see on the screen.
        • To the extent they may care, they also see a counter campaign of folks claiming otherwise, and they don’t really have a good way to casually know which viewpoint to take seriously.