Summary

President Joe Biden criticized Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s decision to replace factchecking with community-moderated notes, calling it “really shameful” and “contrary to American justice.”

Zuckerberg defended the move, claiming factchecking undermined public trust and stating the company aims to prioritize free speech.

The decision follows Meta’s rollback of diversity and inclusion programs amid legal and political shifts.

Biden, in his final press call as president, emphasized the importance of countering misinformation, labeling Meta’s approach irresponsible and harmful to truth and public discourse.

  • Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    When the president calls a mega corporation’s action “shamefull” is this some kind of regulation? Is this some kind of penalty?

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      24 hours ago

      It’s just virtue signaling. What he actually meant to do is send weapons to Israel but he got confused.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Hey non-voting lefties! Join us in appreciating the last time you’ll see a President say something that’s not only factually correct, but is in line with your personal beliefs!

        Ahhhh. Nice, isn’t it?

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Democrats should be forced to pass electoral reform in all blue states as punishment for losing to the world’s biggest loser twice. Blue conservatives no longer deserve to go it alone against the republicans.

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          If only Biden was president, and could order shooting neonazis about to take the reigns of power… via an official act that is legally protected?

          The whole “enemies, foreign and domestic” thing…

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            57 minutes ago

            Well it sure would be interesting, but I doubt that will happen. And frankly, that’s ok by me if it doesn’t. I prefer my justice to be ethical wherever possible.

        • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I’m with ya, but at this point it doesn’t really matter, and he’s still doing ICC shenanigans. Fuckem both i’m not american (and i vote in my elections).