iii@mander.xyz to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 10 个月前Pornhub and three other porn sites face EU child safety probewww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square59linkfedilinkarrow-up1138arrow-down11
arrow-up1137arrow-down1external-linkPornhub and three other porn sites face EU child safety probewww.bbc.comiii@mander.xyz to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 10 个月前message-square59linkfedilink
minus-squareJerkface (any/all)@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down6·edit-230 天前Removed by mod
minus-squareSir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·10 个月前You’re not wrong. But if I had to pick between blocking .xxx on my kid’s device or uploading a photo of my ID to various porn sites, I know which one I’m choosing.
minus-squareJerkface (any/all)@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down18·edit-230 天前Removed by mod
minus-squareमुक्त@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·9 个月前Access to .xxx domains can be mandated to require detection of parental controls, and needing proper age verification if they are not in use. Or I am missing some design problem here?
minus-squarepack_of_racoons@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·9 个月前This is a parents are too lazy to parent concern not a security concern.
Removed by mod
You’re not wrong. But if I had to pick between blocking .xxx on my kid’s device or uploading a photo of my ID to various porn sites, I know which one I’m choosing.
Removed by mod
Access to .xxx domains can be mandated to require detection of parental controls, and needing proper age verification if they are not in use.
Or I am missing some design problem here?
This is a parents are too lazy to parent concern not a security concern.