• Jarmer@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a very good thing. Thank you EU for forcing us dirty heathens in NA to have consumer protections.

  • kratoz29@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Excellent, I like that I can replace batteries easily from my old handhelds, the only issue for that case is finding trusted ones.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think there should be a requirement for easily expandable storage as well.

    Switch and Steam Deck seem to be OK for this, but I’d like to further piss on Apple’s chips.

    • AnonTwo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Isn’t the main issue whether or not there’s an ease to replace? There’s like 20 steps and a bunch of easily breakable cables involved with replacing it currently.

      I mean I think you can replace the Switch’s battery too by that standard.

      Same site even says it’s only 1 extra step in total, though instead of the cables being in the way, it sounds like the shields a bit more difficult.

      But like either of these replacements would require a technical user to do it.

      • lackthought@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        ‘ease to replace’ to whom?

        seems like an impossible to define standard, but I’d be interested to hear what the requirements are

        if they supply the necessary tools and steps/videos, is that enough?

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Steam deck done.

      Not really. Look up the Linus Tech Tips teardown. The battery is glued in super hard. Linus said he spoke to Valve about that and according to him Valve said they’re looking into making it easier to replace at a later date. Since then I’ve not seen any reports about a change.

      • sorenant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And requires heating + prying.

        If this is considered replaceable, I wonder what an non-replaceable battery would be. Soldered to the main board and trying to unsolder it causes a failsafe to short the CPU?

    • juliebean@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      i think ‘user replaceable’ should involve no tools, and a minimum of time. if step one involves removing eight tiny screws, and it only gets more cumbersome from there, i don’t think it counts.

      • 73ms@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s something to be said for this as well certainly but I do think the deck is still much better overall than will be required since they actually offer spare parts for sale for pretty much everything and repair guides too.

  • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I wish the EU would just stop getting their grubby hands ibto everything they possibly can

    Gotta love the reddit-tier “downvote anyone who disagrees” mindset here. It’s like I never even left reddit!

      • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m against regulations that get between parties and enforce terms onto voluntary agreement. Why is it the position of government to tell me what products I should and shouldn’t want to buy? If you want shit with removable batteries, cool, go out and make your demands heard. But why should your demands be pushed onto everyone else as “pro-consumer” when it ignores the demands of literally any consumers who have different preferences than you? What about the consumer that doesn’t give a fuck about usb-c or removable batteries? Why should they be made to buy products designed around standards that aren’t important to them?

        • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you want shit with removable batteries, cool, go out and make your demands heard.

          They have. That’s why the regulators are making these laws.

          But why should your demands be pushed onto everyone else as “pro-consumer”

          It’s pro consumer because it benefits consumers. As of right now, most portable electronics have a built in expiration date. Most people lack the skills to replace a built-in battery and official stores rarely do replacements, so it’s down to a 3rd party shop which is difficult for less knowledgeable consumer to find.

          It’s the same reason why we have any regulations against anti-consumer practices. It’s because these practices often rely on deceptive practices and consumers ignorance. In this case, the consumers are not informed that the device they are buying is built to expire after a few years.

          I don’t see any argument you could make about usb-c or removable batteries hindering your usage of the device.

          Most countries mandate that products come with a warranty. I haven’t heard anyone saying “what if I want to buy a product without a warranty?” Because why would you?

          • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They have. That’s why the regulators are making these laws.

            You’re aware that not every personal preference has to be enforced by law, correct? You can express your preferences without calling for any form of government action whatsoever.

            It’s pro consumer because it benefits consumers

            No, it benefits some consumers. I, for one, very much would not benefit from this. Batteries replaceable to the standard the EU wants absolutely have downsides, primarily concerning space, meaning either larger devices, or smaller batteries, and in some cases, likely both. For example, if you open up a modern iPhone, you’ll find that the battery takes up every nook and cranny it could be fit into. And the phones still maintain a slim design. That shit is basically outright impossible to make under this standard of idiot-serviceability. And because I’m perfectly fine with having to use big scary tools like a soldering iron and heat gun, I have exactly zero problems with buying devices that would require them for service, especially so considering the benefits.

            Most people lack the skills to replace a built-in battery and official stores rarely do replacements, so it’s down to a 3rd party shop which is difficult for less knowledgeable consumer to find.

            Which doesn’t fucking impact me at all. I’m not a less knowledgeable consumer. So why should I be stuck playing by rules for their benefit?

            I don’t see any argument you could make about usb-c or removable batteries hindering your usage of the device

            USB c isn’t some pinnacle of design. You seriously find it unthinkable that any cable could ever be superior in any way? And I already covered downsides to the idiot-servicable batteries.

            Most countries mandate that products come with a warranty. I haven’t heard anyone saying “what if I want to buy a product without a warranty?” Because why would you?

            More examples of regulations isn’t an argument for further regulations because law is not inherently self justifying.

                • damnYouSun@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Lol says apple simp. See how that’s not actually a counter argument see how you actually have to explain your points in order for them to be valid and see how you failed to do so because every single point you come up with lacks evidence.

                  You have said that it is impossible to make efficient batteries that a user replaceable, but you have failed to demonstrate why this is the case. Phones have historically had use of replaceable batteries for years it’s been fine. Manufacturers just realized they could force people to buy new phones more easily if they didn’t make the batteries replaceable, it’s got nothing to do with efficiency, and everything to do with anti-consumer capitalism.

                • ABCDE@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Try not talking like this, you’ll have more meaningful interactions in your everyday life which aren’t immediately hostile to everyone actually engaging with you, resulting in mutually beneficial discussions rather than the arguments you’re clearly constantly looking for.

        • damnYouSun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Good god you’ve missed the point haven’t you?

          If you want shit with removable batteries, cool, go out and make your demands heard. But why should your demands be pushed onto everyone else

          Because companies are not providing products with removable batteries so the consumers refusing to buy products with non-removable batteries doesn’t work because there’s no alternative product to purchase. Manufacturers know they have consumers in monopoly so they have no reason to change.

          What about the consumer that doesn’t give a fuck about usb-c or removable batteries?

          The USB c-thing is not just about user friendliness it’s also about the environment. Constantly having to throw old charges away because their incompatible with new products produces an enormous amount of e-waste, everyone using the same charger reduces it, which is only a good thing. Also the Apple charger which is what I’m assuming you’re going on about is actually less safe than the usb-c standard. I think we can all agree that manufacturers should use safer options when they become available.

          Why should they be made to buy products designed around standards that aren’t important to them?

          If a product has a feature you don’t care about, why do you care, just don’t use it and you’re fine.

          • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because companies are not providing products with removable batteries so the consumers refusing to buy products with non-removable batteries doesn’t work because there’s no alternative product to purchase

            There are plenty of products with removable batteries. Not my problem if you don’t want them. You’re objectively incorrect in saying no alternative products are available.

            The USB c-thing is not just about user friendliness it’s also about the environment

            Cool, don’t give a damn

            Also the Apple charger which is what I’m assuming you’re going on about is actually less safe than the usb-c standard

            I’m talking more generally about any cable anywhere with superior elements to usb c. But yeah, the lightning port apple made was a massive improvement over micro USB, the standard at the time for everyone else, and is still a significantly more durable charger port than usb c given its external connectors.

            I have plenty of issues with apple, but they’re a perfect example of making good products that don’t conform to these crappy legal standards.

            If a product has a feature you don’t care about, why do you care, just don’t use it and you’re fine

            You understand the irony in saying this given that you’re of the position that the government should force your preferred features into products regardless, no? I care because I’m stuck with all the downsides of features you want, and companies are literally prohibited from selling me other options.