The special counsel investigation into Donald Trump secured a search warrant of the former president’s Twitter account, @realDonaldTrump, according to a newly unsealed court filing.

  • Alto@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Still not a fan of secret subpoenas/warrants/whatever, but fuck that’s funny

    • Falmarri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is different from a FISA warrant I think. It’s not that it was “secret”, in that it won’t ever be public. Just that they didn’t tell trump first, which as far as I know is pretty standard

      • Alto@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m aware. I’m not a fan of them not being able to tell their users when this stuff happens.

        Gotta wait til after they hand it over? Sure. But they should be legally required to inform the user after the fact.

        • RangerAndTheCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you’re not a fan look into services that have a “canary in the coal mine” or “warranty canary”, the best example of this being at work I can remember would be lavabit or true crypt (RIP). Take what I say with more than a grain of salt… just an old privacy advocate that may dive to deep sometimes haha adjusts tinfoil hat

          • Alto@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Unfortunately a lot of the FISA warrants completely gut organization’s ability to actually fail to renew a warrant canary

      • A statute requires notice of the existence and scope of the warrant. Here, it sounds like the court issued a discretionary protective order, further limiting the contents of Twitters notice letter to trump.