• Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    4 days ago

    Mamdani cast Charm Person, and even though Trump was rolling with advantage, his WIS score was poor even in his best years. Hasn’t worn off yet.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think he’s dying. He’s probably at least losing (what little he had of) his mind.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    Imagine having such an eroded sense of self you cling to what you deem is a strong man and have to emulate him. All While being the president of the US

    I still get amazed at how absolutely stupid MAGA are.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        It makes him look fatter than usual. But his neck looks skinny. It’s an interesting look. Kind of Kim Jong Un meets Hilary Clinton. Is he trying to hide some medical condition? Is he not wearing a tie and not saying thank you? Did Obama’s tan suit guy slip this into the wardrobe?

        • FauxPseudo @lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          The background is different in each picture of Trump and his hair is in different condition each time.

          But imagine if this was a collection of fake photos and videos all with the exact same clothing , across multiple media outlets. Including video that aired on Fox News. A giant conspiracy for an unknown reason. And the Trump administration said nothing.

          Or imagine you are wrong.

          Which is more believable?

          • assertnull@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 days ago

            I think GP was referring to the two images of Mamdami, not Trump. It’s pretty clear that the background in both images is the same but the color of Mamdami’s clothes has been altered, presumably in the image where the color scheme of his clothes matches the various images of Trump.

            • NOPper@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Thank you, that’s exactly what I was pointing to. I have no idea why FauxPseudo (apparently a mod?) decided to only read part of my 13 word comment, skipping the one relevant portion before posting some kinda weird defense for these guys lol.

          • NOPper@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Did…I hurt you? 😆 Check out Mamdani’s clothes between those two otherwise exact same photos.

            • FauxPseudo @lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Sorry. I thought you were yet another person that denies everything about Trump even when it’s right in front of them.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 days ago

      The sad part is, I actually pity him. I have seen that look, I have seen it on my father’s face. And I pitied him too. Doesn’t excuse their actions. Mine neither, let that be for the record. But this got fucking dark. I’ll go home now.

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    It will always be a mystery to me why US citizens always place so much importance on appearances instead of focusing on the important things.

    Here’s an example from the last election campaign: the Democrats were somehow more successful in portraying Trump as “old and strange” than in portraying him as how he really is: corrupt and criminal.

    Well, now organized crime rules the US – but somehow it’s still all about how Trump dresses, how he is old and weird. Yes, that’s true, I mean, the guy has been orange since the 90s, but it’s by no means the biggest problem with this administration — not even close.

    • mika_mika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      I have a family member that liked what Bernie had to say back in 2015 but said they couldn’t get past his teeth. I had no response.

      • DandomRude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s tough. I don’t know what I would have said either. Probably that the family member should vote for Sanders so that dental treatment remains affordable for as many people as possible. But I probably wouldn’t have thought of that in that situation.

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Because no one cares that he’s a criminal, for some reason.

      Also, this is a single post, it’s ridiculous to pretend like this is some mainstream criticism.

      • DandomRude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Yes, obviously, but why?

        Edit: Can’t you see how little this is in your interest? How you are being distracted from the important things? And so easily: Things really went downhill for US citizens under Reagan—and he was an actor, and not even a good one at that. Instead of this straw man, citizens could have voted for Carter. Then the reality in the US today would most likely be quite different.

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    200
    ·
    4 days ago

    Trump always comes out of meetings agreeing with the last person he talked to. He has no mind if his own any more, if he ever had one to begin with.

    • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      It depends if it is about his talk or his actions.

      Yes, what he says is largely influenced who he saw last, but what he does is quite consistent, especially if it involves Russia.

    • MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      4 days ago

      Why don’t all of the left leaning politicians then make it a point to just continually schedule 1 on 1 meetings with him?

      • BossDj@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Trump was a Democrat back when he was handing out BJ’s. Probably got his anger from a scorned lover situation.

        Anyway, I think Republicans all have a carry card that says “Trump meeting rules: 1: kiss his ass. 2: tell him to never meet alone with cheating Democrats”

        Over the years he forgot that cheating was about his male lover and thinks it’s about elections.

        • madjo@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          Bubba told him he was the only one, but then bubba cheated on him with Lewinsky… that made trumpy so angry that he decided to figure out how to run for office.

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        4 days ago

        A lot of people really, really don’t know how to read others and how to manage a character like Trump.

        For Mamdani it was a fucking dog-walk, because he knows people, he’s emotionally intelligent, he’s very, very crafty too. Don’t let the sometimes goofy charm fool you, he’s extremely focused and sharp and careful about everything he says. He just has it down so it looks natural.

        Not saying he’s not a genuine person, but he also knows the game like he was born to it.

        For the rest of the Dems? I mean… there are a few people who have a lot of spirit and fire, but that’s not how to make Trump bend the knee, you have to really understand his buttons and you can’t meet his obstinance and stupidity with force.

        • 5too@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I think a few who were good at working trump in his first administration did do this too - but as you say, there’s fewer than you’d think; and I think when his handlers figured out this was happening, they started scheduling Republicans to meet him right after to “correct” his mindset.

          • ameancow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’m fairly convinced that part of why this term is so batshit is because there are fewer “corrector” handlers left keeping him in check, it’s just Stephen Miller’s “mouth” direct to Trump’s ears. There have been a lot of insider leaks confirming that Miller is just wormtonguing the senile old man day and night.

      • Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think his cabinet knows this fact about him and tries to control who he meets with so they can keep this power for themselves.

    • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m genuinely starting to below eve at this point his fake tan and makeup are meant to hide how sickly pale he’s become. The old asshole is definitely facing some brain melting disease and heart issues.

    • Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      He’s had an epiphany. He’s going to come out as bi any day now and defect to the Greens and by executive order make the stripes in the US flag rainbow coloured and he’s going to rule as a just, benevolent dictator.

        • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          A benevolent dictator is just what the world needs but power corrupts so it would only last for so long.

              • Denjin@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 days ago

                You can’t consolidate enough power into your own hands to enact meaningful change in a country (positive or negative) without violent oppression, therefore making the idea of a benevolent dictator an oxymoron.

            • Breezy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              There hasnt been, that doesnt make it impossible. Improbable for sure, but if someone did take over(aliens) who dont let the power go to their head, then there could definitely be a benevolent dictator.

              • Denjin@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                But short of aliens, no one could take over, as you say, without violent repression of their opponents so that by definition, they’re no longer benevolent.

                • Breezy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  You speak of absolutely when even without aliens there is a chance. People should have more hope in humanity, which i have little of(but not none!).

                  Also i never said no violence, its clear there will probably be plenty. But there can be justified violence to aim for the greater good.

          • SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I don’t think a benevolent dictator would do the world good.

            No one should have that much power. If nothing else, because it tends to drive said person mad. Just look at how paranoid Stalin was.

            Also, the entire idea of a dictator involves rule by force. That’s exactly the kind of thing we would prefer to get away from. All laws involve force, yes, but the more we can move away from violence and towards peaceful cooperation the better off humanity will be.

            • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              4 days ago

              Even some of the most celebrated “enlightened” monarchs and dictators are kinda corrupt. Napoleon was a liberal, republican but set up his own dynasty. He was good to the French and those oppressed by the old blood monarchs, and allowed religious tolerance, but he was pretty harsh towards the Germans and made examples on those who questioned the embargo on the British, which hurts continental Europe more than the British.

              • SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                Oh, definitely. I don’t thing a good dictator can exist - even if you put the most moral, ethical, upstanding person you can imagine in charge - but I was accepting that premise for the sake of argument to show the other problems with that model (i.e. that a single point of failure is bad).

                Having one person make all the decisions unilaterally just amplifies their flaws and tends to place them in an echo chamber where they are insulated from reality, common sense, and the consequences of their actions by a group of mewling, scheming sycophants.

            • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              Even if a benevolent dictator was able to somehow be both effective and ethical (doubtful if that’s even possible for the reasons you describe, but let’s pretend it is possible for the moment), things inevitably fall to shit after that dictator dies.

              We need only look to the Roman Empire to see how that plays out. Augustus Caesar was far from what I’d call ethical, but he was pretty effective. However, the empire suffered a heckton of instability whenever the emperor was an asshole and/or a nutter. This is most apparent in how Emperor Nero being overthrown in 68AD led to the Year of the Four Emperors

              TL;DR: even if a benevolent dictator were possible, it’s still not a sustainable model for running society due to it being a tremendously brittle system that has a single point of failure (the dictator).

  • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s… Actually a good look for him.

    I absolutely hate saying anything nice about him, but yeah… That look kinda works for him.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      its probably because the way he wears his suit, its always look like its choking him, because he wants to hide the folds of his necks.

    • Stupidmanager@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not to be an asshole but uh, that is what got us into this mess. Maybe not you specifically, but uninformed ignorant people who never took the time to learn and voted cause they saw that orange idiot on tv and he claimed he too was a racist fuck who was going to clean up the swamp.

      • AmericanEconomicThinkTank@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Well from a socio-political standpoint, propaganda just plain works.

        When you take a strong mix of continual white-washing of rhetoric and policy across American radio and television, a good forty years of right-wing political maneuvering towards further local focus in messaging and turn-out, as well as a continual lack of ease for most Americans to even spend the time to get politically informed, nevermind exposed to new points of thought; you end up having a vast swath of the population that can’t even afford the time to vote, those that do have a wide margin that either aren’t able to, or are so socially entrenched they dont want to hear about non-republican major talking points, and you end up with the general basis of where we are now.

        That doesn’t nearly cover the whole scene, but I’d recommend looking through some of Pew Research publications on elections to get a little better idea of the way turnout ends up.

        Tldr; its complicated as hell lol.