This is your daily reminder that LLMs don’t “know” anything. They are a really complicated way of averaging out all the data on the internet. All this means is that the internet, on average, believes the word Trump is used in relation to pedophiles, and Grok was able to match an ensemble of pixels in an image to the word Trump.
For a minute there I thought grok had actually sat down and watched trump fuck kids.
I mean, Elon probably did steal a lot of confidential Government data during DOGE…
This is your daily reminder that LLMs don’t “know”
Everyone fucking knows that. Everyone. Can you please stop like your bringing some revelation. ?
Well, nope. You should talk to some of my colleagues, most of them IT engineers (and a couple of C-suite guys). That have swallowed the marketdroid speech about LLMs and there is no way to convince them those are just glorified linear regressors able to predict a stream of tokens without any resemblance or ‘knowledge’ about it.
Pretty funny and now I’m also starting to wonder which elite wouldn’t be connected to various pedophile networks. Maybe the image generator should remove both, who knows
To be fair, Pooh looks like he’s never had any sex ever.
make sense, since chinese people arnt doing it either, hence thier population crisis they are desperately tyring to “fix”
US has the same problem they’re trying to fix, hence anti-abortion and removal of heaps of sex- ed/ safe sex material. They’re riding the puritanical wave to try and get the poor to keep pumping out babies, that they then can’t afford to educate, to continue the supply of ignorant psychopaths the current government needs for keeping the ungracious in line.
china is finally facing the same problem as places like canada,usa, they have too many recent grads with stem degrees but not JOB market, and no way to pay for thier HCOL, or COL. plus thier one child policy did a lot of damage that they cant even replace generations of woman that are gone. hence why thier constant “taiwan sabre rattling is a distraction”
It’s not smart… People need to understand this… its not making choices based on logic or data or facts.
It has been given data that says trump pedophile and then the image processing part finds the thing labeled trump and removes him based on the label… thats it
Proof?
The FBI is slow trickling that out now. So far, nothing they have provided refutes the person you’re responding to.
So, I’ll ask: proof?
The CIA has suppressed the sources I was going to provide to refute the lack of refutation so I suppose we’re at a stalemate here… Good play 🤝
To the people boohooing about Grok. Do you not realise this was posted as a joke?
