Sorry, this reads more like ai campaign slop than a response.
It’s also, at earliest in a Canadian time zone AFAIK, 1am when you wrote all that.
Goodnight.
Edit: To those annoyed. Look, the beginning was silly (what creates a middle ground? Two different positions, one being the progressive wing’s!) And then was a long ramble about how the NDP would be good for the vulnerable which is to completely miss the point and reads like they just copied and pasted something.
I’m protective of my time and I imagine others are too.
Sorry, this reads more like ai campaign slop than a response.
It’s also, at earliest in a Canadian time zone AFAIK, 1am when you wrote all that.
Goodnight.
Edit: To those annoyed. Look, the beginning was silly (what creates a middle ground? Two different positions, one being the progressive wing’s!) And then was a long ramble about how the NDP would be good for the vulnerable which is to completely miss the point and reads like they just copied and pasted something.
I’m protective of my time and I imagine others are too.
Lmao, alrighty then.
Writing posts late at night and giving a detailed response = AI.
Have a good rest I guess.
You just went off on “nuh uh, here’s why the NDP is good for vulnerable people” which is to miss the entire point.
It’s like when Bondi asked why we aren’t talking about the DOW in the Epstein hearing.
The person you’re discussing this with is clearly more knowledgeable than you are. So you resort to “they must be a bot.” Good grief. Blocked
It’s more they went on a semi random tangent about the NDP for the vulnerable, which is not the point.
It’s like Pam Bondi being surprised people laughed when she brought up the DOW in the Epstein committee.