Their tagline is literally ‘you buy it, you own it’. But does it really grants ownership?

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    4 days ago

    They allow you to make as many offline backup copies of the games’ installers as you want and you don’t need to use any of their services after purchase (except downloading from their site), it’s as close as it gets to “digital ownership”

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      They allow you

      No, this is a lie. Copyright law itself allows you to make copies for backup. GOG merely follows the law without trying to gaslight you otherwise, like other online game sellers do.

      • Janx@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        You keep attacking other people who are on the same side as you. What specific law are you referring to?

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/117

          (a) Making of Additional Copy or Adaptation by Owner of Copy.—Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, it is not an infringement for the owner of a copy of a computer program to make or authorize the making of another copy or adaptation of that computer program provided:
          (1) that such a new copy or adaptation is created as an essential step in the utilization of the computer program in conjunction with a machine and that it is used in no other manner, or
          (2) that such new copy or adaptation is for archival purposes only and that all archival copies are destroyed in the event that continued possession of the computer program should cease to be rightful.

          In the comment you replied to, I was talking about (2). In a bunch of other comments (the ones disputing the validity of EULAs), I was talking about (1).

          Also, I’m not necessarily intending to attack people on the same side as me; I’m just sick and tired of all the corporate-serving misconceptions being bandied about in this thread (and in every other discussion of this topic, for that matter). It’s fucking exasperating how many people have drunk the corporatist and copyright cartel flavor-aid. Corporations don’t get to decide what people are “allowed” to do!