![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/2665e448-91d9-484d-919d-113c9715fc79.png)
When I was leaving college a quarter of a century ago I briefly considered going into game dev…even back then everyone said it was low paid and gruelling work, so I passed.
It’s shocking that people still go into it.
When I was leaving college a quarter of a century ago I briefly considered going into game dev…even back then everyone said it was low paid and gruelling work, so I passed.
It’s shocking that people still go into it.
Except if you read the article, that’s not at all what is happening here. The title is just click bait garbage, just like trump is dishonesty garbage too.
You’re gonna need a lot of pets to feed a whole bus load of immigrants!
Yeah but the title makes it sound like it was a threat, rather than just a statement that she is going to lose money as a result of her statement.
Trump is garbage, but the title is garbage too.
I can’t remember a time that I’ve heard a more obvious projection, especially when it makes no sense. Who would read my post and get “triggered” from it? Lol
Look at the grammatical errors throughout their post. The cherry on top being the statement at the end being terminated with a question mark.
They also just recently had a question that includes them being on a pip.
I get the feeling that this person should be grateful that this doctor is only making enough more than they are that they would use the word “twice” to describe the salary discrepancy.
We’ve been transitioning from a dignity culture to a victimhood/outrage culture for most of my adult life. The relevant one here is the outrage culture, where people are trying their damnedest to be the most outraged. Nothing shows that you are more are outraged by something than suggesting that someone should die for being in disagreement with you.
Blue MAGA are the most damaging and toxic political movements in modern political landscape.
I know you’re going to pretend you’re not a trump supporter, but dear God you shouldn’t have made it so obvious that you are. Lol
I like my bidet and soft tp too. Although the to in my office isn’t bad, but it’s certainly more the bidet that I miss. Definitely prefer to shit at home, as most people do.
But the implication of your first post was that it’s somehow unhealthy because the shit is now “inside you.” Which is what I was addressing, not the non stated claim that you simple prefer it for bidets and toilet paper.
I assume people are interpreting it as the former, which is why all the down votes
I can read what you’re being told. I can also read what you’re saying. And I can also see how funny it is that someone who is creating the false dichotomy of the election being “voting for/against genocide” is hilariously and hypocritically chastising people for saying “you’re either for us or against us.”
“If you’re not with us you’re with the enemy!”
Holy shit the lack of self reflection here is at epic levels of ridiculous.
People aren’t really targeting the cultists. We are targeting the undecideds with these statements, or the people who think democrat policies are bad, but at the same times are not sure about supporting trump.
What are you implying about this? That it’s a useless comment because they aren’t active? Or because they aren’t active they are free to speak their mind on the matter?
If the ultimate goal is to protect your health, holding it in us clearly worse than smelling a little bit of shit. You’re position is, quite literally, irrational.
Bold of you to assume I’m a person. Lol
This is where “it takes one to know one” very accurately applies.
You don’t know the OP very well. Notice the color of the hat. One of their main talking points, because they have to “muh both sides” everything, is that Democrats are “blue maga” and that is what they are referring to here.
Their framing of how AI works is grossly inaccurate. I just corrected that.
Okay, but is the person still an officer? I mean, it is in the name. The way I see it, as a layman, it is kind of hard to ding the author for getting this wrong when they are technically correct and a laymen would consider them an officer, and the only real complaint is that colloquially military members don’t refer to them as officers.
What am I missing or wrong about?