Where exactly are we holding Demecrats to a higher standard?

One thing I actually noticed reading news and reading articles in politics is that almost everyone who could criticize Trump did it, even for free.

Artists did it, journalists did it, scientists did it, actors did it and even normal people did it.

Where is the higher standard you are talking about?

You are basically are asking for people to not talk about corruption at this stage.

Can you explain your reasoning here for calling them idiots?

:)

I actually linked to the itch(.)io Bluesky post, before deleting it and posting this article for accessibility reasons.

Not everyone is comfortable using Bluesky.

ProPublica? Common Dreams?

?

I am looking for interesting article links, not the abstracts!

RSS is not a comprehensive solution in this case.

Think for example about us goverment, there is agencies that does not provide RSS feeds and even the ones that do are too many to follow locally.

That is where what I am talking about come as the most common sense solution here.

To answer your question here, AI can provide a brief summary and can even help in the selection of press releases.

You mean in the title?

???

Did you understand my question?

Does not use projects like piped.

As I said in other comment, he lowered Twitter expanses without actually lowering the quality of service quality (I don’t know if he lowered moderation for costs or personal control) .

I would preferred he do the costs minimizing measures more slowly, but I don’t think anyone can criticize the efficiency there.

And all of that while not knowing anything about how social media companies work or having previous experience.

I am saying all this as a person who use Mastodon and BlueSky instead of Twitter.

Most people who left Twitter left it because of Elon ego rather than the way he manages the company internally.

The codebase is in Java.

PipePipe is not written in kotlin.

Well played😂

How did you get that knowledge or feeling?

I’m asking because most articles I’ve read that analyze the recent election say that many voters who supported Trump did so primarily because of economic concerns.

Your arguments here sure sound like you are a very serious and thoughtful person.👍🏻

Do you have any examples or references of this?

I hate Elon Twitter actions, but Elon actually cut a lot of their costs without any actual significant losses of quality.

I don’t know what exactly is Elon stand on spending on moderation on the platform(there is a lot of pirated content there). I really don’t know if he removed moderation to have a better control and more freedom to do what he want or he did it to only cut costs.

In all the cases, you got my point.

Just because I hate him, doesn’t mean I should criticize everything he ever did in life.

It’s ok to have a balanced view on people you love or hate.

You are talking about unofficial leaks?

In that case, it’s even more important than any other case to seperate between officials and their countries.

"Ukrainian official had said that Ukraine have 1000 nuclear bombs’

Is unofficial statement marked clearly, on the other hand:

“Ukraine says they have 1000 nuclear bombs”

Is misleading and does not represent the situation correctly and would lead to people being misinformed about what is a leak and what is an official info.

It’s more factually correct and better representative of the situation.

Just because official X said that, does not mean that the whole country is ok with him.

Citzens and politicians should be separated to keep emotions outside of this.

Let me show you two headlines here:

“Russian president declare officially a war on Ukraine”

Or

“Russia declare war on Ukraine”

Which one is more representative and more accurate of the situation?

I think you would understand my point from my example here.