European. Contrarian liberal. Insufferable green. History graduate. I never downvote opinions expressed in good faith and I do not engage with people who downvote mine (which may be why you got no reply). Low-effort comments with vulgarity or snark will also be politely ignored.

  • 24 Posts
  • 1.67K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle


  • Easy. Preferences > Contrast control > Manage colors and set the background color to black or whatever.

    You will never be whiteflashed again. Some websites will be ugly, a few will be unusable (you’ll have to unset it temporarily for them, or use a different profile). But many will be just as good as with Dark Reader.

    In any case, this is literally the only way to banish whiteflash definitively. It also has no speed penalty because it’s native.




  • I’m mortified :( It’s never been my goal to make others feel bad online. I had a quibble with the wording on a meme and clumsily worded my idea of “Our differences shouldn’t be minimized because they make us special” was seen as transphobia/TERF rhetoric.

    Try not to take it personally. You waded into a subject which has become a sort of rationality-free zone. Perhaps more so even than Israel-Palestine, or immigration in Europe. On these topics there is almost nobody left who is interested in nuanced debate, it’s now only a question of identifying which “side” one’s interlocutor is on, and then unloading on them (or downvoting, or deleting, or blocking, or banning) as appropriate. You stumbled into sterile trench warfare, basically.

    Soon after I joined Lemmy I was banned from a (somewhat serious) community for making the same mistake you made. I learned my lesson. With certain topics, genuine debate - open-minded, good faith discussion - is just not possible. I see it as a failure of Lemmy, yes, but mainly of the whole medium of text-based social media. It’s certainly not your fault.


  • Okay for the recent figures, but much of the rest is just projections, as I mentioned.

    As for the coal GW figures, they are dwarfed by the equivalents for solar, as you surely know. More than 250 GW for the same recent semester, it would seem.

    And despite some improvements of air quality, Chinese cities are among the most polluted worldwide.

    This is just not true any more, at least for the southern megacities where electrification of transport is in full swing. The AQI comparison with India in particular is now like night and day. Are you as concerned about India’s lack of progress as you seem to be about China’s imperfect progress?

    On this latter front I personally have no need for statistics. I have recently breathed the air myself in central Shenzhen and Shanghai. Forget India, the better comparison these days is with Switzerland.

    Whatever China’s failings in politics and civil liberties (or lack thereof), I see no reason to deny the obvious truth here: in terms of both the energy transition and liveable cities - i.e. freed from the internal combustion engine - China is now leading the way globally. In comparison we in the West are hypocrites and failures.


  • is still increasing its coal consumption

    AFAIK this is not correct. Permissions for plants continue to be granted but the new plants themselves are not being built. If only because coal is now becoming substantially more expensive than solar, which China is rolling out on almost unfathomable scale.

    It’s easy to carp about all the downsides to this revolution, but the uncomfortable fact is that the rest of us signed up to do all this ourselves too, because ultimately it’s the only way to address the climate crisis.

    As for air pollution, again, however bad it might still be, it was much much worse only a few years ago. Southern Chinese cities are now almost unrecognizably cleaner than they were. Yes there are ongoing issues, particularly in the north as you say, but I think we should be able to give credit where credit is due.








  • Seems to be a misunderstanding. My proposal concerns servers, not communities. It would do no more than responsibilize users (“your virtual home here has people who may be your neighbors”) and encourage them to join local communities where they might discuss local issues (rather than, say, US politics).

    What youre asking for, IMO, is for the fediverse to work more like facebook and twitter, which HEAVILY bias their feeds towards local matters. The US would not have been so easy to turn into a xenophobic ball of angry people if their social media were MORE international.

    Corporate social media is only biased towards local if you count the whole USA as “local”. Again, seems to be a misunderstanding. In the US case “local” would mean state or town.