Eskating cyclist, gamer and enjoyer of anime. Probably an artist. Also I code sometimes, pretty much just to mod titanfall 2 tho.

Introverted, yet I enjoy discussion to a fault.

  • 580 Posts
  • 2.17K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle
















  • One side of your deskpad may be grippier than the other. I noticed this with my pad when I flipped it once. The keyboard side seems to have become worn and become rough on a visually unnoticeable level, so my mouse now slides way better one end of the pad than the other.

    Also, others have suggested teflon replacements for the skates.

    You can also get “universal” adhesive glass mouse skates. Once I tried glass skates on a mouse I never wanted to use anything else.

    That said I benefit from this most when I use my mouse for gaming. It might be pointless for average use, but the extremely low friction is very comfortable.





  • And you took exception to me saying you were indifferent?!

    I am anything but indifferent when it comes to how to operate my corner of the fediverse.

    But when the problem isn’t mine to solve, yes? Would you expect me to be vegetarian just in case the person next to me in a restaurant doesn’t want to see anyone eating meat?

    We wouldn’t be arguing if you agreed to tag it.

    So start reporting. I have and will consider every report I get. I use both votes and reports to gauge where the line is so as to offend as few as possible. When I do get reports I flip the tag or remove a post until it is tagged, more often than not. And as I keep telling you, I DO TAG THINGS FROM THE START.

    Provided the report is even close to reasonable. Some people seem to think every anime woman is underage or deliberately intended to appear as such, and that all depictions of them are solely for imagining immoral acts.

    Stuff like “shitton of pedo-adjacent crap” and “scantily clad busty teen-style cartoons” makes me pretty sure you are one such person.


  • Please use it. Please.

    Are you missing the part where I literally do?

    Whole instances hiding your content because of persistent complaints

    I’ve gotten reports from exactly one user on programming.dev. I barely get reports in general. Despite consistent daily posting for over a year.

    IT’S NOT MY PROBLEM, IT’S YOUR PROBLEM. CURATE YOUR OWN FEED

    Exactly. My content isn’t offensive, and anything clearly more risque I DO TAG. So if the content isn’t for you, you should block it the same way I block music communities, because I’m not interested.



  • I take it you’re referring to rule two in some of my communities. The one that forbids posting content that is more than “mildly arousing”. That is hardly me explicitly asking for content that only falls into that range.

    You act as if upvotes are given involuntarily. As if people upvote things just because it is there.

    Communities grow, content is posted, and upvoted to become more visible, because there are people who want to see and share it.

    This isn’t an advertising platform, or some algo-driven hellscape where pleasing some piece of code somewhere is more important than posting things users actually like. I’m not paying to get more upvotes, I’m literally doing whatever people approve of the most. Deliberately.

    There is absolutely nothing wrong with trying to reach as many people who WANT to see what I’m posting, and nothing you can say about what you think my reasons are can change my mind. I know what my reasons are, and you are simply refusing to believe me.


  • So set up an account on programming.dev.

    I’m not going to retort any of the rest. I’ve made my point before and in this thread. You’ve clearly decided it’s unreasonable, and gone ahead with interpreting it as negatively as possible.

    For anyone else reading, yes, I have and would describe some content I post as “mildly arousing” but a lot of that would fall under the stuff I DO mark NSFW.

    This person is acting as if I never mark anything NSFW and don’t care who it affects. This is incorrect.



  • Thank you for the aknowledgement.

    When it comes to that second post, had I gotten a report on it, I would probably have flipped my decision not to mark it NSFW, as I have done on some posts in the past.

    But I didnt get a report. Edit: though I went ahead and changed it now.

    The others I could hang up as posters at work just fine.

    On the subject of sensibilities differing

    I have images like that one, and “worse” in my wallpaper rotation both on my phone and PC. I even have some pieces depicting actual nudity in an artistic setting.

    My city has public statues and art installations that do that. In fact kind of a lot of places do. Way too much of the world suffers what I consider weird hangups on this subject.

    I get separating pornography from public display, but this isn’t that.

    While I respect people not wanting to see certain content (and their right to block it), I don’t see what’s so offensive about the human body, or the aesthetic appreciation for it that some us feel, to the point that even non-nudity that displays the wrong shapes has to be censored lest someone somewhwere take offence to the point of it causing genuine averse consequences.

    Even then, lemmy doesn’t have the kind of complex tagging system that would allow people to define what they don’t want to see before they see it. I expressed in this thread that I don’t want porn in my feed, but if I were to disable NSFW content on my profile, a lot of not-porn I do want to see would go with it.

    How many people would miss my post if I err on the side of caution too much?

    Would I flag it as “midly provocative” if that was an option to allow those who want to to filter it out? Sure. But we don’t have proper tagging on lemmy. Not yet. And NSFW is synonymous with pornography for A LOT of people, which again, this isnt.

    Hence why sopulis policies on blocking porn fit me so well. And why programming.dev should absolutely do the equivalent for whatever types of content you want enable your users to see.

    I realise I’m at an extreme end of the matter, which is why I DO flag some things as NSFW even when I don’t personally bat an eye.

    But I also can’t just flag everything, or mark the entire communties NSFW, because that IS used for porn, and will be what users expect and post if I did.

    So I do my best to offend fewer people, but at the same time the content I want to share is often in a place where people simply don’t agree on what it is and how to categorize it.

    And while posting with an abundance of caution would be nice, it means suppressing discovery on all instances, instead of just some, and mostly being found by users browsing for something to masturbate to.


  • I don’t think so at all.

    I am on sopuli.xyz mostly because it’s run by finns, but also because they defederate and block pornographic instances and communities, which I do not want to see.

    Given that there is transparency, then, this type of instance-level curation, means each user can choose on what instance they would like to create an account, and get a starting-point for the kind of content they would like to curate.

    This decision makes programming.dev a perfect home for users that were going to block these communities anyway.

    Yeah, you can just block everything you don’t like, but if theres an instance with a policy that aligns with what you want, you can cut down on that work a lot by just setting up your user there.


  • They can’t. They can only hide things for their users, not other instances.

    The local home admin of a community could entirely remove it, but they cannot hide it for other instances.

    For off-instance communities, an admin can either hide them (visible to local subscribers) or block that one community (visible to no-one on the instance). But this again only affects the one instance, and has to be done by each instance that wants that community to be hidden or blocked.

    Even if a community is hidden on its home instance, it would only become hidden on that one instance.