PZK [he/him]

I fortunately don’t have any of this. I do exercise regularly but I wonder how long it is before some chronic pain starts appearing.

Everything is political, not just when your views are challenged.

If the source isn’t negative about China, or doesn’t cast them as the villain in every scenario, it must be propaganda.

But naturally, the opposite is never propaganda.

How are you supposed to keep them from passing on the cost of taxes to their tenants?

You have to realize that they still “own” a limited resource that lends them power to leverage over others. The only way you make this abuse go away is to have the people collectively own the land. Any accommodating regulations you place on landlords will only be temporary until they are worn down and removed.

I have been enjoying pop os. A lot more plug and play than I was expecting.

*Me saying a fairy tale scenario that will not exist under capitalism.

*Reality standing behind me.

You can’t and wont deliver a long term solution for “middle class” people by working within that system. The goal of capital is ultimately to have as few as people as possible, with as much power as possible. Any middle class you are talking about will become lower class and poverty class with enough time. It absurd that you can look at the current system and believe that it would ever deliver on your promise. Believing that it would work with an uncorrupt government is trying to say that there is an “ideal” version of capitalism out there and we just need to do that.

You are looking at the only version of capitalism that exists. Any regulations, safeguards, and safety nets will be corrupted and withered away eventually because the people and institutions that supposedly uphold these ideals will be rewarded for doing so. You create a competitive class system and you are shocked and outraged when people cash it out to gain, or maintain their social class to avoid becoming lower class.

They can’t. I guess the game is over.

What are liberals supposed to do if they can’t just label something to dismiss it?

If you really think that bots are this effective, then why don’t liberals create their own bots?

If you think they don’t work then what is your problem with them?

I keep seeing the claim that their are bots everywhere when liberals encounter something they disagree with… yet they have not been able to program their own chat bots to counter them?

Surely liberals would recognize this advantageous strategy and flood the internet with their own bots. Because we know that it couldn’t just be them stepping outside of astroturfed reddit, only to find their ideas are not as popular as they we led to believe.

I suppose they will just keep labeling people uselessly when encountering conflicting evidence.

Reaching levels of copium not thought possible.

“This should be higher.” “Savage.” “Doggo.” “Raises spork.” “Russian bots are really active today.” “CCP shills.”