Canada has adopted the controversial IHRA definition of antisemitism years back and Carney plans on pushing further with additional laws that would disallow protesters to protest illegal real estate auctions because they’re at places of worship.
https://www.readthemaple.com/how-the-israel-lobby-shaped-canadas-definition-of-antisemitism/
Thank you for the context!
It’s definitely important to see what the PM decides to focus on and communicate. Canadians need to be more politically involved rather than avoid their political leaders.
What’s Scotty’s angle?
This has already been reported on, and it’s actually Israel that currently hacks the cars onboard e-sim to geo-locate. Also cars systems don’t have robust cyber security and can also get hacked through that e-sim.
But now it’s scary because China is sending cars over.
The working class struggle and the genocide are the same struggle.
Sure, but if the standard is consistent and based on legal precedent. All while the UK allows Israelis to enter the UK and spread actual hateful content that actually causes strife.
I still don’t know if I can make a generalization that it’s because Israelis are predominantly of a faith and therefore are cultish, and by extension likely to be abusers within the faith. In the end, a majority of Israelis are not religious and don’t subscribe to religious doctrine.
So I agree with your second paragraph:
I think these stats are a reflection of just how toxic Israeli culture has become in some areas. It’s a slippery slope from → these types of people are not human to → inhumanity applied to other groups, as we all know. Eventually it is applied on oneself when it becomes so ingrained in the culture.
And because of how sadistic and toxic the culture is, it’s even more apparent in the spinoff cults.
The context of the post and comment are about liberal zionism, and the extended context is that a liberal zionist is just as bad as a fascist, which is true. The big common denominator (amongst many other things) being genocide.
Israel has been largely headed by liberal zionists for the majority of it’s genocidal colonial history so far. It’s only recently that the rightwing have gained the majority they enjoy now. And they both agree on the genocide, just differ on the optics and language used.
Nothing satanic, it’s just abuse with some dressed up frills to get the victim to accept their abuse. And Israel is choke full of abusers.
Even a survey found that the majority didn’t think forcing another person into sex is considered rape.
College Study: 41 Percent of Women Students Don’t See Forced Sex With Acquaintance as Rape. 61 percent of the male students polled in a small college survey did not equate forced sex with an acquaintance as rape.
I think you misspelled “genocide”
South Africa isn’t a totalitarian state, it’s a proportional representative Republic. Which means that if a party has X percentage of votes and seats, they get a seat. South Africa have the GNU (government of national unity) coalition and McKenzie said that he would walk away if he wasn’t given a seat - thereby dissolving government. So he was given the sports ministry, the most insignificant position since the World Cup way back when. And in that role, he’s just pushed his racist rhetoric and corruption
How can you appoint someone like that (a convicted criminal)
So if someone wants to bring up something that they’re not very informed about, it’s called “muddying the waters” of discourse, especially when that person wants to try and push their rhetoric on whether Israel is apartheid and what South Africa’s more accepted stance is on the topic.
Like, why even bring it up if you don’t know much about the politics involved? What point are you arguing by saying that this voice in South African politics says that apartheid doesn’t exist? Should we argue the Jim Crow policies didn’t exist because some MAGAT said so and platform them?
Ah yes, McKenzie who is the president of the Ultra Right wing opposition party (Patriotic Alliance), very racist, very corrupt (gang ties, bribery, embezzlement), and constantly tries to buddy up to Israel because I’m sure Israel doesn’t have a vested interest to promote the opposition in a country calling out their apartheid - especially one that’s just as xenophobic and racist as Israelis.
Probably best to look at who you’re referencing when trying to muddy the waters.
One could argue that they’ve achieved some of the objectives - Israel got a slightly weakened but emboldened Iran to Boogeyman the West with (they even were hoping ahmedenijad would come back to power) and Trump got the conversation off the Epstein files and also enriched himself and family.
I thought Iran ramped up the cyber attacks after the US and Israel started bombing them - like Kash Patel’s email hack.
Is Starmer trying to win easy brownie points while he’s managing everything else horribly? It’s not like he can do anything about ticket prices for things on the other side of the world either.
Ah, so it won’t be covered by the Leahy law that USAID reported as being breached and the US should stop sending military aid to Israel because of that.
I don’t know if we’ve read the same article because it reads as fear mongering defensive improvements with the tone that it’s for offensive use.
China’s nuclear missiles can already reach any city in the United States. Now, satellite images reviewed by Reuters show Beijing is building a sprawling web of launch pads, bunkers and communications nodes near the isolated nuclear silos that hold the Chinese military’s longest-range missiles.
China’s nuclear build-up is among the most scrutinized facets of President Xi Jinping’s military modernization because of what some foreign diplomats describe as Beijing’s lack of transparency and failed efforts by the United States to engage the Chinese leadership on its evolving nuclear capabilities and intentions.
But some senior Western diplomats and analysts say China would possibly resort to nuclear coercion to limit outside involvement in a conflict over Taiwan.
The scale of what is emerging in China’s northwestern desert has left even seasoned analysts startled.
They want absolutely zero condemnation and will throw a hissy fit like the self-entitled little ethno fascists that they are
It’s DW, Germany is notoriously hypocritical. Try and debate that Israel is an apartheid state or has been genociding Palestinians and see how far that goes.