Why not use tranquilizers? Field biologists use them to check up on wild animals, why can’t they use them on “criminals”?
My southwest flight will be on a max 8 both ways. Wish me luck.
If you don’t maintain your fleet, eventually they’ll all fall out of the sky
Yeah, I’d rather not get CWD from a deer I found dead on the road
Aside from the security risk, they’re probably mitigating the amount of traffic incidents that are bound to occur when the crappily coded cars enter the market
Monster hunter world and satisfactory
You pay for your windows license?
Thisis what the nazis would’ve looked like if they were Asian or black
I don’t get it. When does it become morally acceptable to block traffic?
Between Just Stop Oil and Stop Arming Israel, they both have equally valid points. So why is it that blocking the Golden Gate Bridge is “based” while blocking various feeder roads in Britain makes you a twat?
Edit: messed up the titles
I think the point was that her voice cracked and it was a comparatively mid halftime show
Just like the good ol’ days after 9/11
Stop caring about the opinions of racists.
Testout labsim is where you’ll learn all the stuff you need (if you don’t just go to youtube). You’ll have to order (or redeem) your tests through comptia themselves.
Source: Took the test last year for A+ and Security+
Because it that case, you wouldn’t be able to slash any more tires.
It’s also not fun to be dead
Another interpretation, and an interesting catch-22, is that they are simultaneously the best and worst contenders for presidency. The act of wanting the presidency warrants at least some ulterior motive, but also requires at least learning how to run a country at the bare minimum. Without the latter, you just can’t run a country.
Yes and no. On one (nihilistic) hand, you live to die. The other hand (the better one) is that you give your own meaning to live. Fill in the spaces between the living, dying, and suffering parts, to make them seem insufficient in comparison. Just like the time you spent with your cat.
Nothing makes either side any less true - it’s all up to interpretation. For your mental health, though, it’s better to follow the latter.
It could also be the fact that a lot of modern presidents aren’t fit for presidency as much as they can mislead the people. In a perfect world, you could’ve voted for Nader and not regretted it, because you’d have known that the people that surrounded you weren’t naive. Personally though, I feel like raeganomics was to blame for too many of America’s problems.
And yet I still can’t believe it’s not satire