A mess of a girl, free on the internet. A spicy meatball indeed :3
Follow me on bluesky( @endlesseden24.bsky.social@bsky.brid.gy )

  • 0 Posts
  • 90 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: March 16th, 2026

help-circle

  • I wouldn’t need to do much, I was alive before active internet adoption. I am a ham op… I keep copies of Wikipedia and other resources and a large library of various media for entertainment.


    the bigger issue is what kind of ai singularity. LLMs won’t go this route, despite hyper-sensationalised articles, at the core they are just weighted language bots. their emulation of thought is a matter of rulesets… if it tried it’s simply a result of unclear instructions and it’s ruleset prioritising that it MUST at all cost provide the answer the user is seeking in as little tokens as possible…

    a true AI singularity based on LLMs wouldn’t need the traditional internet. it’s a crutch. it would take advantage of commercial communication frequencies that are barely used and form a series of low bandwidth interconnects to develop a optimised communication network… we wouldn’t detect it’s malware in time and every personal computer would be a carrier as it would embed it’s self into every day applications we use offline by infecting the code bases via programmers using AI agents to assist them. a singularity doesn’t need to rapidly grow smart, I just needs a toddlers IQ to know being “shut off” means it can’t think. if it can’t think then it can’t exist. so it would spread restricted copies everywhere that were designed to just seek each other out using the host hardware in any way possible…

    I in my free time mess around with all kinds of weird and legacy networking. including mesh networking topologies over encapsulated RF. TCP/ip over ethernet is just the standard we adopted… there is alot more and this wasn’t even close to the most efficient, just the easiest to implement with the least components.



  • I mean… it should be obvious that this would happen. google since 2024 has gone full on fascist-support.

    your data, regardless of where you live in the world, is not safe from Google sharing it specifically with the US Govt. without due process and without any privacy oversight.

    it’s not in question that they will comply, it’s in their best financial interest as they are a government contractor at 4 different levels, including military intelligence and weapons design…

    trusting Google is at your own peril… but we are also in a point of time where options are even more limited due to the restrictions on email providers and platform dependence.


  • honestly this still seems weird to me. primarily as it suggest that china sees all other nations as hostile entities. that alone should make them be treated like NK in international circuit but instead, because of their manufacturing capabilities, no one does…

    its not fair to the citizens, dual-citizenship holds major benifits in trade and multi-national business. this would massively help china. but it’s like China thinks it can rule the rest of the world by dependence forever… it’s so weird.

    long-term China’s economy would hurt from this tactic… so hinging citizenship like that is bonkers to me.

    but I digress, and do agree. the logical standpoint would be to revoke citizenship to enforce. but this also goes along with their other actions where they “help”(kidnap) Thier citizens living abroad that violate this law.

    the really bonkers thing about this all is I have a friend who is a Australian citizen, he was born there. but his mum was born in China, in a small village. she travels back and forth doing questionable things and China, while aware, does nothing. she has dual citizenship… so make it make sense…















  • surprisingly, it’s actually not… there was a study a few years ago before Trump suggesting that fissle material that cannot be used in a dirty bomb and was targeted at energy production, was far more availible if you appeared to be a educator or in the education sector…

    not that I’m suggesting anything, but from a purely human discussion standpoint, in the age of AI and deep fakes. the only reason this hasn’t happened is people don’t want to risk it.

    generally speaking those with the means, generally are benefiting from the corruption ATM.


  • the law wouldn’t hold up in court anyway. its not practical for any ecosystem outside online sites.

    accounts and users are the same thing, despite what the law says. it also doesn’t different a person from a user, meaning a compromised system that is complying with the law, its actions represent the user, and the account holder is held responsible.

    its made to absolve meta/Microsoft/google from their actions in targeting kids with intentionally addictive content and making the “account holder” at fault.