Glog78

@arc99 the same way as you did encrypt it ??? with gpg ?

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35584461/gpg-encryption-and-decryption-of-a-folder-using-command-line

??? the needed certificate are exchanged by for example a matrix / telegram or personal ???

And don’t underestimate kids … Or better asked yourself how did they get porn in the 80s and 90s ??? ( and yes they did )

PS: and honestly imho this hole “protection talk” is totally nonesense or are parent’s not anymore capable of protecting their kids? Tell my one reason why a kid < 16 should have access to internet without supervision ? An Emergency Call can still be done without internet.

This hole discussion is like if you would had let a Porn VHS in the 80’s unlocked in the living room and your kid unsupervised for hours in the living room. Would have someone called in the 80’s to audit if your porn has been stored kids savely you would have gone crazy.

PPS: Just because you don’t have statistic’s how many kids watched adult content in the 80’s or 90’s doesn’t mean it didn’t happen !!!

@arc99 you still don’t understand end 2 end encryption. Yes man in the middle decryption can be done. First for this to happen you need to accept the certificates of the firewall ( which in terms of a home PC you can’t force anyone to do ). Second even if you can decrypt the https packets , you can still put an additional layer on top which only you and the reciever has the keys too.

To give you an example you can easy write down a base64 encoded binary blob in any text field on a website. If this binary blob has been encrypted before noone will be able to tell what is inside.

So breaking https is useless if someone really wants to hide informations. So no your deep packet inspection is totally useless. The only thing you know is that someone did put strange stuff in a text on a website.

@arc99

I said (picture) your deep inspection falls short to real end 2 end. You said your firewall can break end 2 end … nope they can’t and never will and you exactly said this in your last post too. (Sidenote -> i can gpg a text and post it public even with https … for 99% it will be giberish and only the person who got the right key material will be able to read it ) … so using deep package inspection to identify something you want to protect kids from is just a lie …

@arc99 but end 2 end encryption is not by default https traffic ;) ssh / vpn are protocolls ( end 2 end encryption, decryptio) and this firewall can’t deep inspect while this protocoll can easy tunnel other tunnels.

@arc99 please inform yourself about end to end encryption and decryption.
All i say is you haven’t understand what is happening on this firewall and what this firewall can do and what the firewall can’t do.

@knatschus @SaharaMaleikuhm This is an interesting take. I hope that Email Clients which supports GPG ( none Microsoft Products ) will also deny recall from function like brave does by default -> https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/23/brave/_browse/_block/_microsoft/_recall/

It would also be a interesting question if under GDPR companies need to tell you that they might have shared your emails with Microsoft because they enabled Recall ( if they so do ) …

So many questions …

@arc99 @SpaceCadet thats basically allowing the Government to force the ISP’s to build a solution which is able to sensor every content. Sorry there is alot of reasons why you should be against it.

PS: even your deep packet inspection falls short to end 2 end encryption / decryption …

@Canconda who knows how many people get moved by this topic. Let’s say noone believed in >1.4m people signing a petition for game preservation either … noone would have believed that europeans say that US Tech Companies should be regulated even if it means worse tarrifs … if you already give up before trying to change something you lost already. From my point of view this creates something which can be used in a really bad way for content moderation ( some would call it censorship ).

@Canconda i don’t think that it’s currently about the money. this is another fight against liberal ideas. In the last months i have seen bigger companies giving into a certain speech … or do we want to talk about all those companies even outside of the us who don’t talk about DEI anymore ?

@Canconda @ToxicHolyGrenade ;) i think you can google yourself for the special scenes in Dragon Age: Origins , The Witcher , GTA 5 or Leisure Suit Larry … that are the 3 games out of might head wich had alot of publicity because of this topic. With the same argumentation those groups might try to remove or change those games too …

@network_switch @Jackhammer_Joe oh on a sidenote -> https://www.theverge.com/2021/8/27/22641095/onlyfans-sex-work-ban-online-porn-payment-processing-controversy << just a reminder …

@network_switch @Jackhammer_Joe even authoritarian states doesn’t like dependencies which can tell them what they have to do. So those companies are a risk for their independence… my personal feeling europe’s right people might not like porn but they probably would rather fight for porn then let a none european company tell them how they have to handle business ;)

@DarkSideOfTheMoon @1984 and all this additional JavaScript and Elements and makes the side’s just horrible slow. Compare this with CSS+HTML only sides omg how good they can feel … I also prefer nowadays text mode browsers again, cause a good readable font + focus on what is important … the content itself. I really get pissed if websites with public content can’t be run anymore without javascript (wtf is up with you guys ?) …

@Alaknar i didn’t notice that there wasn’t an update. I think in a way the project was finished , cause as far as i remember you could play the game from the start to the finish.

@Durandal @audaxdreik don’t forget it has a modern reimplementation of the engine -> https://arx-libertatis.org/

@FreedomAdvocate ;) just saying you are making things up … i never said something should be free and yes we are done

@FreedomAdvocate This is my last answer.

Anti Consumer = working against the Consumer …

https://www.reuters.com/technology/nvidia-faces-us-doj-probe-over-complaints-rivals-information-reports-2024-08-02/

^^^ if you define NVidias Consumer as business

If you define NVidia Consumers as common people wanting a gamer gpu than you can keep believing that they try to do all those things to make you the cheapest and best offer and keep buying them.

I am not going to stop you! Since you don’t know me and you don’t know my experience and past with nvidia and seem not want to accept my standpoint -> i am not going to force it on you. But i want to ask you to refer from calling something “most stupid” just because you aren’t sharing the other opinion…

@FreedomAdvocate there is a reason why WINE = Wine is not (a) Emulator is used. So don’t call a api reimplementation a emulation specially since other api reimplementation have shown to be better than the original implementation from the hardware provider ( example dxvk on amd > the original amd dx implementation ) . But this gets us far from the original topics , my point was if nvidia wanted to have real competition they would have included all those new fance features into official api’s like for example DX or Vulkan or any other.

They didn’t … and while not directly against the consumer it is against the consumer end.
So i have brought up another point why i call nvidia anti consumer … neither you like it or not.

@FreedomAdvocate what is more shady a reviewer who doesn’t follow nda’s or the company who makes nda’s … you can decide yourself i have made my decission and we have since then got far away from what it was… Is NVIDIA anti consumer … yes on multiple levels … you can disagree but i have enough resons to say so

@FreedomAdvocate zuda is an reimplementation of an api not a emulation.