

And funny enough it’s a conservative supreme court who align with Reagan created that BS “historical tradition.” Rule has resulted in those laws being called unconstitutional


And funny enough it’s a conservative supreme court who align with Reagan created that BS “historical tradition.” Rule has resulted in those laws being called unconstitutional


Yeah if the data was from a source that the courts considered legal then it would then be viable


Given who is in power now the whole “it gives you the constitutional right to a fire arm.” Might want to be reconsidered.
(To be clear not saying Charlie Kirk’s “mass shootings is an acceptable thing to keep our guns.” Logic is still absolutely BS. It’s just with the State on the Federal level and in every Republican controlled state turning to Facisim at a rapid pace a community defense that is armed is looking rather valuable to have.)


Same issue. It’s called chain of evidence, something that is required for evidence to be admissible.
No matter what solution one can come up with the origin of the evidence is needed


Erm in this case they would. Yes the Trump administration has had a lot of leeway but the Judicial system is not a full on rubber stamp just yet.
And as for the Supreme Court no they actually won’t because the plain text is rather clear. You need a warrant to collect evidence.
“Have a warrant for the phone and whatever is on it? If not sorry per the explicit saying of the constitution it is inadmissible.”
And those others also getting released as it relied on warentless material.


The material is declared inadmissible and whoever they are prosecuting gets to walk free


And this is why when I buy a Toyota I am going to go for a used model that doesn’t have the computer tech thank you very much


In this case they would have to as there would be no way to hide that they accessed the data without a warrant and also the material would be rendered inadmissible and whoever the DOJ was hoping to jail gets to walk away free


Given how the stock collapsed and is stabilizing back up Trump probably does mean to back off. If there is anything consistent it’s that he backs out when the pay day doesn’t look forthcoming


While you are not wrong here I was more trying to hint at Green Energy which folks (even myself) were yelling to adopt when it came to Russia invading.


Man if only there was some type of Domestic energy source that could have also benefited the climate and folks are pressuring for. If that existed then Europe wouldn’t find itself caught between two different Super Powers looking to rule the world
Stop data collection and AI implementation


“I only want people I like to join. If you say no I will punish you.”


Am I wired in that I myself personally don’t like these “flexible schedules” systems?
Not disregarding them entirely as no doubt for others it’s a benefit.
But for myself I honestly prefer having a set consistent schedule. Preferably the weekend (and only because of what the job I have weekends is the busy time compared to weekdays.)


deleted by creator


deleted by creator


deleted by creator


deleted by creator


deleted by creator
Or she could plea Democrat Witch Hunt