They’re lying about the rule itself to justify more lies

They know they can’t reliably distinguish AI from non-AI by the individual piece of content, and they’re pretending otherwise so they can silence actual humans and let chat bots propagate while labeling them as human or AI

Don’t forget to thank platforms like Bluesky that make people think discussing suicide is some kind of taboo / policy violation and you’ll get banned if you bring it up on social media

Guy might not have known he can literally just discuss it in a place with reasonable enough rules like the fediverse

Incorrect, the problem isn’t that it’s not thorough, the problem is it’s an abusive gaslighting lie designed to support other lies, abuses, and gaslighting.

And if you want to talk to me without being civil, I suggest nostr, there are no bans there.

Sorry for my hostile tone

Still somewhat easy

Either lying or deluded. Maybe you’ve only heard the least realistic sounding algorithmic music or something

I’m honest about use of chat bots, it’s not actual AI or a brag.

But not everyone is so honest. The point is to be able to filter people like me, filter some other random people, and let through the preferred chat bots of the authorities while pretending they’re humans.

You do realize that people can still tell when slop is passed as music

In the past, but what about the future? Or even the present?

And the only reason it’s so prevalent on spotify and whatever other corpo platforms is because it’s used to pay artists who upload there less, right?

Sounds right, yeah, but what does it have to do with what I said?

This literally has the same effect as simply banning AI content you are complaining about

You’re definitely trolling

For a global feed? No, as far as I know nobody has one yet

For individual feeds? Yes, “web of trust”

You add a “verified human” tag to any users you’ve met face-to-face

Then you can filter by

• Your tagged humans
• Tagged human by you or those you follow
• Tagged human by you, those you follow, or those they follow

Etc.

And the focus should be on filtering bots and ensuring accountability, not trying to stop people from posting “AI”

You can still post incorrect shit generated by chatGPT, but if you want to show up in filtered feeds, you have to be an actual human saying chatGPT’s incorrect shit with your own face’s reputation on the line

This is much better than pretending it’s possible to prove what is or isn’t “AI” as an excuse to later pretend some AI posts aren’t and some non-AI posts are

So if you state the values of your platform that makes it OK to lie?

I ask again when people will learn this is a dumb approach

Meaning all music the creator admits was made with AI

Wonder when people will learn this is a dumb approach

For new products made going forward, they should have to release all the code, period. No good reason for keeping hidden security flaws

Meh. Just use Linux

I’m going to need a whole lot of context that’s not in this post. If you think this post is calling out a specific Democrat, you have not conveyed that at all.

My bad idk wtf happened there, what I typed doesn’t even seem coherent to me. I think I got confused what thread we were in because you’ve replied in a few of my threads today. Or maybe I meant to explain better how a different thread where I got banned for calling out COVID denialism was what reminded me how this powder keg moment for the Democrats isn’t necessarily a path to true progress on its own. Didn’t even remotely explain that though, just accused you of missing context, more like I mixed up the threads.

“Nazis denied that racism makes no sense”. Wait, so you think that 1) racism makes no sense, and 2) Nazis denied it/ claim otherwise (i.e. they claim racism makes sense)? I think you’re severely mis-stating whatever you’re trying to convey. Racism is a very real thing, and it’s usually Republicans and Nazis who claim it makes no sense as a concept, and claim it’s just a label created to attack them for political purposes.

Nazis, including America’s Republican and Democrat branches of the Nazi party, tend to uphold that racism makes sense - that you can divide the human race up into a few smaller races by grouping ethnicities together with similar skin colors.

Science has developed far enough past this to make it a great example of denialism, which is a hallmark of Nazism rather than non-Nazim.

Nazis denied that their beliefs were rooted in racism, because racism was (even in the 1930s) understood as a cognitive and cultural bias, not beliefs rooted in science or fact. They didn’t deny their own disdain for non-white people, they just denied that it was racism.

I don’t believe you on this part and even if it was true it just seems like a nitpick since I could just replace “racism” with “ethnic purging” and make the point impossible to argue

Denialism is in fact contra-indicative to Nazism, who were very concerned with legitimizing their beliefs openly, so as not to have to hide/ deny them.

You are incorrect, Nazis are famous for denialism, e.g. systemically denying that their war criminal lives are less valuable than the lives of civilians

We would be in a better situation if republicans had not won at all.

Baseless statement without considering how different the Republicans would be in a world where Democrat voters force Democrat politicians to serve the public interest instead of just propping Republicans up.

Biden was one of the best presidents of my lifetime

Literally declared the pandemic over and encouraged people to stop wearing masks, wtf

In reality and not metaphors, we would not be in the situation we are in today if people were more careful how they support “their side” instead of just supporting Democrats blindly.

Voting for Democrats does not help. Donating to Democtats does not help. I hope you already know lying for Democrats is even further from helping.

Talking about the good things they do helps. Talking about the bad things they do helps. That helps the better ones win, right?

You have to think about your choices if you want things to really get better.

We might never have concentration camps if people stop helping Democrats prop up Republicans and start forcing Democrats to work as a tool against Republicans.

Not sure I read your comment correctly but if so, my response:

With Republicans we have people dying in the streets yesterday, and concentration camps tomorrow (metaphorically)

With Democrats we have people dying in the streets today, and concentration camps the day after tomorrow (metaphorically)

do you think that Democrats support “using mass murder for eugenics”?

In case you missed the context, I was commenting on a likely Democrat going to a convention 5 years into an airborne pandemic that targets whoever its spreaders deem “genetically weak” (via its immune system test) to kill or disable.

Also 2 years into an active direct genocide in Gaza and many decades into the terrorist Israeli occupation of Palestine.

Israel on the other hand cloaks its eugenics in the language of/ mask of Securitization (which it learned/ inherited from America and Europe), which exists to give a veneer of deniability to it being a eugenicist State.

And Nazis denied that racism makes no sense. Denialism isn’t particularly what defines non-Nazis.

Mass-incarceration is another case where eugenics is very relevant when examining its evolution from/ replacement of slavery, but is not the goal of Democrats.

Show me the Democrats you’re talking about then, because I haven’t seen them - and make sure they also don’t do shit like go to “cons” 5 years into COVID, unless your goal was just a gish gallop of random subject changes.

I am not a Democrat, but I’m not going to label them “slow-moving Nazis” for rhetorical convenience/ expediency (nevermind that it’s counter-productive when trying to pull people away from identifying as Democrats).

Trying to pull them away is an outdated mindset. Nazis defeated electoral / constitutional democracy long ago. The question is whether we can pull control away from them, not change their minds. Denialism is actually kinda their thing, it gives them control rather than taking it away.

“Nazis eat food, so if you eat food, you’re a Nazi” = dumb and not what I said

“Nazis support eugenics, so if you support eugenics, you’re a Nazi” = dumb but something I’ve been told by what I presume is your type of person before

“Nazis support using mass murder for eugenics, so if you support using mass murder for eugenics, you’re a Nazi” = a fair way to read what I said

“Nazis serve the Nazi party of World War 2 era Nazi Germany, so if you serve the Nazi party of World War 2 era Nazi Germany, you’re a Nazi” = another fair way to read what I said, given the Haavara Agreement etc

deleted by creator