The thread itself is actually already 1 year old. Well, look at the screens above. Somebody asked for a follow-up, so I gave a follow-up of both the average posts by day for Lemmy as well as Mbin… The trend is still up.
The thread itself is actually already 1 year old. Well, look at the screens above. Somebody asked for a follow-up, so I gave a follow-up of both the average posts by day for Lemmy as well as Mbin… The trend is still up.
And… for the Mbin users out there. Here is the same average posts by day, but on the Mbin platform.
It seems that. 1) Cumulative graph is removed, because cumulative doesn’t make sense. There is an average graph though. Average Lemmy Posts by Day… 2) In just a single day the numbers of this new average graph exploded… that can’t be right… 3) What about all the spam posts!??
My point exactly, now you have genAI code written by AI, who doesn’t know what it is doing. Instructed by a developer, who doesn’t understand the programming language. Reviewed by a co-worker, who doesn’t know what is doing on. It’s madness I tell you!
Thank you! That is indeed a valid point. I was hoping more people came up with this valid remark. Do you have any other questions or predictions you would like to know? So that we don’t get “surprises” in the field of technology again?
I predicted that introducing AI on software engineer (especially juniors) will result in overall worse code, since apparently people don’t feel responsible for the genAI code. While I believe the responsibility is still fully at the humans who try to deliver code. And on top of that, most devs are not doing good code reviews in general (often due to lack of time or … skill issue). And now we have AI that generates code which are too easily accepted on top of reviewers who blindly accept code… And no unit tests or integration tests… And then we have this current situation. No wonder this would happen. If you are in software engineering, you would know exactly where I’m talking about. Especially if you would work at larger companies.
No sh*t, this is what I predicted from day one.
I’m afraid the power needs for AI will also not decrease. Even if individual models become more efficient and the hardware become more AI optimized. The next logical step is to run even more if those AIs as agents and creating huge chain of thoughts… So no, ai power usage will increase.
We need to leverage existing solutions like how Ana archive is working. Which makes use of torrents. https://annas-archive.org/ Like read this carefully: https://annas-archive.org/datasets
Luckily for you Arch has the best wiki pages out there for documentation purposes. If you have any questions regarding Linux or you want to know something, just ask.
Try Tor maybe? Although it’s not very fast…
Only they called it “estimates”
Well… the numbers were from Wired: https://wired.me/science/energy/ai-vs-bitcoin-mining-energy/
ow nevermind, bitcoin mining alone is consuming 112.31 TWh annually (it’s a guess). While AI is using 29.2 TWh annually (also a guess).
Article says (but don’t believe them):
But it’s not all ads. In fact, Microsoft does make useful changes from time to time
What about trying to install Windows 11 with a local account instead of using a Microsoft account?
Shift + F10 -> Enter: oobe\bypassnro followed by… you know what? Try: format C:\. And install Linux already.
And then people were complaining about cryptocurrencies… Look at this AI joke… Come on…
I didn’t saw it earlier… :P