More people would be able to innovate on said “non IP”. Multiple lines could be developed by multiple independent teams, extending the non ip however they see fit. By encouraging competition, the better content would thrive.

It lowers the barrier of entry, enforcing competition and lowering distribution cost. And without the ludicrous profit margins and legal overhead from big conglomerates, it would be cheaper for the consumers, and more of the fees could be distributed to the actual people working on the creation.

This is prettyranty, sorry if it’s not too clearly articulated.

Come join us on lemmygrad!

https://youtube.com/@thedeprogram9999

They are Iranian, Serbian and something else, if I’m not mistaken. An interesting mix.

Read the official rust book until you feel like want to experiment with something, then go to advent of code and try something, anything out.

Then start investigating why it doesn’t quite work. And I guess gpt for suggestions and random questions isn’t a bad idea.

I mean. In teams the client is the business, not the employees.

So… There’s no plans to decommission it, ever?

And progress in moderating tools would be made.

They would block lemmygrad, so I don’t really have to care. Being on lemmygrad makes that stuff self selective. 🎉

If you have only minutes, and prefer videos: https://youtu.be/07E4iQ5z9iY

We’re not advocating violence. Your premise is wrong.

But we know our adversaries commonly use violence, so we’re aware it exists, and we know we have to prepare for it.

Are colonialist governments not violent? How do you remove from office a government that commits violence against their people, en masse, to destroy their land with mining operations?

Concrete example: how would the Congolese vote the French out, when anyone organising peacefully against the French is assassinated?

The point is not violence. But it would be naive to ignore the violence of our adversaries.

Dude. Fucking buttons. We’re so amazing!

I had a low end Samsung like this and I miss it so much.

I’ve uploaded a few read by tts at https://pca.st/podcast/3af50c70-30cd-013c-f68a-0acc26574db2

Not too proud of it, but might still be useful.

There’s also audioteca critica, with actual people reading the books, https://pca.st/podcast/5a409f90-829a-013a-d7e9-0acc26574db2, in Brazilian Portuguese.

Class consciousness.

So then we stop fighting each other for peanuts and look at who gets to benefit from our generalised political apathy.

I dislike the urgency thing. “4 more people looking at this, only 1 spot left”.

I also hate when it when the ads follow me around every social media platform.

That’s why I love it here. Thank you lemmy.

That image reminds me of the Botez gambit.

Have you met lemmygrad.ml?

https://lemmygrad.ml/comment/4527265

There’s a comment someone made in lemmygrad that reminded of your reply to me.

Sorry to not address it point by point, but I hope the link is useful. I’ll try to do it later, but can’t really promise it. :D

The benefit is that there’s at least a goal that will benefit the poorest strata of society.

Capitalism doesn’t address it at all. It’s every man for themselves and fuck everyone else. That’s textbook recipe for sick societies, like all capitalist societies on the planet. None of them work for the poorest of the people, none of them attempt to do so.

It’s crisis after crisis, with random economical meaningless inflation fear mongering to get people to hate their fellow workers. To compete for an ever decreasing pool of jobs.

But it is rational for any individual to not work as hard, because he will bear less of the cost of that work, but still realize the same gain

They wouldn’t realise the same gain.

More valuable work is better paid. Skilled management is likely to get better pay than menial work. Dangerous jobs get better pay than safer jobs.

You are not allowed to become rich by exploiting others, though.

From each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs. - Marx in 1875.

Its not about equality, it’s about fair distribution of goods and services produced by the society. As in, it is fair that national leaders get to fly planes to travel abroad frequently,for example.