3.5 GB disk space required? I’ll just look out the window, thanks.
Not even with someone else’s dick.
I wouldn’t go anywhen. My dissatisfaction is intrinsic and the year is irrelevant.
I’m still able to manage blocking ads in all forms of media that I consume. No unintended shifting of timestamps.
or… is it?
The graphene install docs is in your language and will walk you through the install process. Their support page points you to discord, telegram, matrix support channels as well.
https://grapheneos.org/install/
https://grapheneos.org/contact#community
As a general rule anyone that asks for a non-proprietary thing that will do everything their proprietary thing does without alternative solutions allowed is so far from the reality of non-proprietary software in a proprietary world that they can not be made happy so I’ll leave the support of that to others.
Like anything else, can be, depending on your needs.
I don’t mean this flippantly but suicide is ok. The hard part in my mind is if you ou leave behind people that would be fucked up in your absence. That’s the part I struggle with.
It’s not Voyager’s fault, Lemmy has always promoted dead and abandoned communties as “trending”. The grouping is useless and can always be safely ignored.
On desktop, I use an ad blocker to hide the div.
Why wasn’t “not go” an option?
It’s reddit, you get what you get. That’s why the majority of us stopped using it.
I read the synopsis of the book(thanks for the link). I can see where a book like this wouldn’t be appropriate for a 10yo but an entire school system ban seems an overreach.
It would be nice to ensure that as a parent, I was the one introducing topics to my child but having raised her already, I realize that unless I kept her at home her entire childhood, that’s a pipe dream. I would have been ok with that book being at her school and if she had read it, she most likely would have talked to me about it as we had many candid conversations on sexuality, relationships and other topics that she came to be aware of via the internet, media or friends.
I’m very curious about what content in a Judy Blume book met the “pornographic or indecent material" burden mentioned in the article.
Other states hoping to finally be able to become a completely Christian-run entity will be taking notes.
Can I ask why you can’t let them talk their nonsense? I know you don’t think you can change them so if you choose to hang out with them, why can’t you just let them be them? I’m not telling you that you should hang out with them, just that joining in on their discussion is a zero sum game.
I chose not to interact with family any longer and haven’t spoken to any of them in years. Not out of anger or spite but simply because none of us were getting anything positive from the relationship.
The senators were not the ones that exposed anything.
The John Doe profiles were set up in April as generic 24-year-old males
Does the fact that they only used dummy male accounts and didn’t bother to find out what women are subjected to represent the authors’ own misogyny? Perhaps The Guardian should look at cleaning it’s own house up before finding dirt on others’.
You’ve discovered the power of a niche social platform. I single-handedly provided content for a classic car community for over one year before realizing that it was less of a community and more of a blog. If it’s not political or technical, a lemmy community will most likely die when the single provider gets tired of the wall of silence.