The real means to prevent this is unionizing, which is really the answer to most other techbro-hellscape problems too. Just like Hollywood is putting anti-ai clauses in their contracts, so too will tech workers need to. Unfortunately, given that the end goal is to remove the IT workers entirely, this is still only a delay if companies push ahead, since just like scabs, there will always be people willing to sell their fellow workers down the river for their own enrichment.

But we’re not even close to that point; most tech workers think unionizing is a 4-letter word. There’s always a private chat room where folks are lamenting the absolute class-ignorance of their coworkers who are all convinced they’re going to stumble into unicorn stock options soon, despite multiple rounds of layoffs each year now being standard in tech.

The real question is what has to happen to end this horrible capitalist nightmare in general.

Her story didn’t end when she was killed, and it is very relevant that her queerness is being weaponized to rationalize and justify her killing by conservatives.

I think your “everyone else” is excluding about 1/3 of the country. Go on a conservative news site, and see if you can find one article about her that doesn’t mention her being lesbian, and understand that they do so because those sites are ‘smearing’ her to their homophobic readers, so they won’t empathize with her.

Go into a conservative space on any social media, and tell me how many are lamenting her death at all, rather than calling her a ‘professional agitator’ or saying she brought it on herself.

Yeah, even as horrible as I know conservatives are, it was still shocking how many of them were making jokes about this, or treating it as somehow making her murder okay. Between this and how many conservatives have been making open ‘jokes’ about mass-murdering the GTA 6 pride parade attendees (the existence of which is not actually something R* has said, and is mostly just these same people pushing), people need to realize that the average conservative is starting to ideate about killing queer people.

Hey, finger crossed! Hope this turns into something. :)

Because Wall Street knows that Trump will let them ride along for the plundering if they bribe him, and (if we ignore that no Democrat president would do this in the first place) they know that a Democrat wouldn’t… At least not in the same way.

Ah yes, the evergreen claim of being about to unveil his Healthcare Housing Plan!

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/SF5MiM-P2p4

independent has always meant the freedom to create whatever you want without input unwanted influence from anyone else.

Yes, and if a publisher is present, you cannot as a consumer ensure this is the case. No publisher actually makes their contracts with dev studios public for review, or allows people to review their internal communication.

No, this distinction prevents publishers from co-opting “indie” as a label, which people support because of that artistic discretion, and hiding it behind their opaque promises of such independence that no one can verify. You cannot trust a dev hasn’t been influenced by a publisher when they’re present, so the only way to ensure that is to not have a publisher present.

I don’t know that movie, but I do know actual indie devs who use e.g. Patreon for funding. It’s not about not having money, it’s about who your money comes from, and whether there can be hidden stipulations on it. With publishers, there always are.

I’m a big proponent of actually trying out a new configuration each week for the first month or so, for a living room. You’d be surprised how different it actually feels with furniture in different spots, but most people tend to just place it when they move in and leave it. Living rooms also tend to be fewer furniture pieces than a bedroom or office, so more feasible to re-arrange.

This will also really help identify where your tv should be placed, to minimize glare or reflections.

Obviously individuals cannot personally fulfill all the things a government does, but that’s because the government is a large group of people. A similarly large group of people who are not employed by a government can still accomplish the same tasks; a weather forecaster for example doesn’t stop being one just because they’re not doing it for a government.

If critical functions that protect lives can be gutted and lost at the whims of a remote and sometimes hostile government we clearly have little control over, perhaps that’s the wrong structure to maintain those functions? After all, it’s not like Trump hasn’t floated enforcing different regulations or providing or not providing help based on location (i.e. excluding Blue states from federal aid) anyways, so even keeping the jobs and regulations in place doesn’t mean they’re actually going to be used to help us.

A lot of the functions like water quality monitoring are done at local levels anyways, even if regulations around them are federal.

Maybe a better lesson from this is that just one civically-engaged person can make a huge difference to a community.

This is great to see, and as long as it’s up to companies whether to do this we need to encourage that behavior… but it also shouldn’t be up to companies’ whims whether to do this or not. It should be legally required for end-of-support devices and software to release whatever source code or changes are necessary to either operate the device/software independent of a server, or run the server ourselves.

I don’t believe those actually resulted in rulings in Musk’s favor. GARM (the org he accused of being an anti-trust violation) shut down citing the legal costs of the case, and afaik the case against the constituent companies is still ongoing, but unlikely to end in his favor. It’s purely a SLAPP lawsuit.

Honestly, operating a private streaming site is much safer than pirate VHF/ UHF broadcasts, both in terms of what you’ll get charged with, and how long you’ll remain undetected. VHF and UHF broadcasts are literal homing beacons (and without something to bounce the signal off, very limited in what you’d reach).

Jellyfin on an offshore VPS, with invite-only accounts otoh…

I was commenting on a likely Democrat going to a convention 5 years into an airborne pandemic that targets whoever its spreaders deem “genetically weak” (via its immune system test) to kill or disable.

I’m going to need a whole lot of context that’s not in this post. If you think this post is calling out a specific Democrat, you have not conveyed that at all.

And Nazis denied that racism makes no sense. Denialism isn’t particularly what defines non-Nazis.

“Nazis denied that racism makes no sense”. Wait, so you think that 1) racism makes no sense, and 2) Nazis denied it/ claim otherwise (i.e. they claim racism makes sense)? I think you’re severely mis-stating whatever you’re trying to convey. Racism is a very real thing, and it’s usually Republicans and Nazis who claim it makes no sense as a concept, and claim it’s just a label created to attack them for political purposes.

“Being racist makes no sense” is a very different statement than “racism makes no sense”. I think you meant to say the former.

Nazis denied that their beliefs were rooted in racism, because racism was (even in the 1930s) understood as a cognitive and cultural bias, not beliefs rooted in science or fact. They didn’t deny their own disdain for non-white people, they just denied that it was racism. Eugenics as a pseudo-scientific framework was developed in order to legitimize racist beliefs so that racists could openly tout those beliefs without them being labeled racist. Racists (Nazis included) didn’t want to have to deny their racism.

Denialism is in fact contra-indicative to Nazism, who were very concerned with legitimizing their beliefs openly, so as not to have to hide/ deny them.

dumb and not what I said

Hence the “like saying” part: it’s illustrative of the erasure of relationships that I’m talking about.

“Nazis support eugenics, so if you support eugenics, you’re a Nazi” = dumb but something I’ve been told by what I presume is your type of person before

Huh? I’m pretty sure I did literally the opposite of this when I said, “All Nazis are imperialist, but not all Imperialists are Nazis, for example.”

“Nazis support using mass murder for eugenics, so if you support using mass murder for eugenics, you’re a Nazi” = a fair way to read what I said

Sure, and do you think that Democrats support “using mass murder for eugenics”?

I despise Israel, for example, but I can also critically examine how we got to the level of support for them that we did as a country, including Democrats. Everything from the anti-Communist/ pro-Capitalist Red Scare propaganda, Islamophobia, racism, and a whole lot of moneyed interests, contribute to the US’s cultural support for Israel.

Eugenicists do not deny that moniker, it was literally created as a moniker by them for their pseudo-scientific framework to support genocide. Nazis very openly promoted that they were eugenicists. Israel on the other hand cloaks its eugenics in the language of/ mask of Securitization (which it learned/ inherited from America and Europe), which exists to give a veneer of deniability to it being a eugenicist State. Democrats who support Israel will deny that Israel is engaging in eugenics (another indicator that Democrats are in fact not Nazis).

Mass-incarceration is another case where eugenics is very relevant when examining its evolution from/ replacement of slavery, but is not the goal of Democrats.

If I’m incorrectly interpreting your meaning here, please tell me; I am not a Democrat, but I’m not going to label them “slow-moving Nazis” for rhetorical convenience/ expediency (nevermind that it’s counter-productive when trying to pull people away from identifying as Democrats).

It’s definitely worth it to help the slow-pace Nazis overthrow the fast-pace Nazis, even if it vaguely “stabilizes” Nazi control.

This is a strange false-dichotomy. You shouldn’t be helping any Nazis.

If this is a “neolib centrists are also Nazis” take, you need to recalibrate your baselines: there are tons of groups out there in between wherever you (and those of us here on Beehaw) are on the ‘Left’ spectrum, and Nazis. Democrats are shitty, feckless, Capitalist, and even imperialist, but you can literally be all those things and not be a Nazi (debating whether Settler-Colonialism is worse than Nazism is a topic for another discussion- it’s still different, and Democrats aren’t pro-SetCol ideologically anyways).

You can’t invert or erase the hierarchical relationship between more general traits and systems with narrower group ideologies in order to make those traits or systems indicators of the group (like saying “Nazis eat food, so if you eat food, you’re a Nazi”). All Nazis are imperialist, but not all Imperialists are Nazis, for example.

I think this sort of irks me a lot because people need to be anti-Capitalist/ anti-neoliberal/ anti-imperialist for their own sake, not just because they’ve conflated them as being “Nazi things”, and thus inherited their opposition from an anti-Nazi stance by default. People need to understand why these things are bad.

I mean… You can. You can train and run models yourself. Lots of people and orgs do.

something something WMDs in Iraq…

American == Fascistic == “Make America Great Again”/ Manifest Destiny == Settler Colonialist… viewpoints