He / They

  • 39 Posts
  • 2.28K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle






  • This is some next-level simping for credit card companies under the guise of being on the side of small businesses. There’s no actual concrete explanation of how this will be worse for consumers, just lots of “but do you really think fighting credit card companies won’t turn out worse for you in the end?” fear mongering.

    This author has some absolute crap articles, such as this one about not shaming companies for layoffs:

    For starters, if you’re part of a layoff, please understand the situation. Employers lay off workers for a reason. It’s usually economics. No manager or business owner wants to lay people off. No one is hiring someone with the intention of firing them in the future. No one is happy about this. For a big business, a layoff could mean an adjustment in overhead. But for a small business – where every employee is critical – a layoff is probably much more serious. So please don’t be so quick to shame the company.

    Bruh, please.





  • On the one hand, I think this is part of a push to digitize all currency eventually so that it can be tracked (and controlled). It also makes things just that little bit more expensive for people who are unable to secure banking, as businesses will now round-up for cash transactions.

    On the other hand, US pennies have always been imo a badly designed coin. They’re both too bulky for their value, but not so hefty that they feel good aesthetically.

    No comment on the symbolism of this particular administration killing the currency denom with Lincoln on it. 🙃


  • The author is cooking the data to say what they want.

    The opposition to data centers in peoples’ local area is very different than opposition to AI. They wouldn’t be okay with the data centers if they were just AWS or Azure regional DCs either.

    People compartmentalize consumption vs production. Propose to put cattle farms and slaughterhouses next door to most people and they’ll flip out, but that doesn’t mean they don’t want burgers.




  • I don’t know, a true conservative should be opposing attacks on the institution of our government. And any gerrymandering is an attack on that institution.

    Which is exactly what Texas is doing, and Prop 50 is designed to be a reciprocal response; it’s not California just going, “well if you’re going to rig yours we’ll rig our’s better!”, it’s California nullifying the gerrymandering in Texas by matching it 1-to-1. If you’re anti-gerrymandering, Prop 50 is what actually discourages it, by making it pointless to do.

    has he come out with any proper long term solutions? Seems to me, at a federal level we need to do things like lift the artificial cap on number of representatives, limit surface area to volume of districts, and limit concavity of district lines.

    He generally doesn’t weigh in on what federal laws he thinks should change now, he stays pretty California-internal.