Terry Truncate Table

That’s always been the case, especially with World religions.

Start a religion where the clergy maintain both written and oral versions of your code as a sacred text.

but they are alive to have the capacity to regret.

Oh, wow, that’s so comforting to know: the monster feel a tinge of guilt. So, are you ready to die for someone else’s character development (best case)?

I find it unfathomable that people imagine that poor people and untermenschen should just resign themselves to dying off. It explains why the working class might resort to terror attacks to assert their right to exist.

The least one can do is understand the class war. You don’t punch down or to the side. You don’t do reverse-Robin-hood.

Aside from that, if all that’s left of this species is monsters, there’s no point to it.

Indeed. And that automobile industry is supported by a large segregationist population who loves living where the buses full of non-white poors don’t reach. That and there’s physical competition over road space for buses, as they require bus lanes. Bus lanes aren’t car lanes, that’s the point of bus lanes, and installing bus lanes is usually unpopular (due to all the car drivers who don’t want to lose a lane or street parking).

What I’m trying to point out is that all sides of system matters, especially if there’s some kind of democracy going on. Blame is distributed.

If your job is indirectly about murdering people, you’re just a soldier and this is war. It is the Nuremberg defense, the “I was just following orders” excuse.

I’m no fan of shitty drivers and I think if we live in a world where license suspensions are a thing, that’s fine but don’t be surprised when stuff like this happens when public transit sucks. It may exist but there’s a reason why a lot of folks prefer their car over poorly funded public transit.

Have you thought about why public transit is poorly funded and developed?

Do you know what “triage” is?

It would not justify it, you just like the excuse because you tend to do similar things. You are not entitled to murder others, especially those who aren’t responsible for your situation, in order to satisfy your “needs”. Cannibalism doesn’t magically become acceptable because you’re starving.

That is premised on the notion that the expansion that has happened until the present is sustainable.

It’s unsustainable. Your expectation for maintenance will not be met.

When fascists do vision boards and manifestation.

And they were arrested, right? Right?

…they export the horrible machines?

I think that if she was done otherwise, it would’ve made the pose more erotic or perhaps made it look like she was letting out a fart.

Reduce. Reduce plastic companies to dust.

Oh, now it’s great, there are apps. Before the internet it was misery and before ATMs it was just spiteful. The whole point seemed to be to make sure that you never get to extract cash from your accounts.

Bank: Perfect.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnum_effect

Servant: What’s your zodiac?

Future Tyrant: giant meteor.

As long time atheist and anti-theist, they love Trump because he’s fulfilling a role of messiah (lowercase), an anointed one. You probably already know this, but it basically means that Trump is a king to them, that’s what the anointed part is about. They’re traditionalists (monarchists).

If you want to get how monarchism works in this context, try Wilhoit’s Law: https://slate.com/business/2022/06/wilhoits-law-conservatives-frank-wilhoit.html

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit:

There must be in-groups whom the law protectes but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time.

For millenia, conservatism had no name, because no other model of polity had ever been proposed. “The king can do no wrong.” In practice, this immunity was always extended to the king’s friends, however fungible a group they might have been. Today, we still have the king’s friends even where there is no king (dictator, etc.). Another way to look at this is that the king is a faction, rather than an individual.

As the core proposition of conservatism is indefensible if stated baldly, it has always been surrounded by an elaborate backwash of pseudophilosophy, amounting over time to millions of pages. All such is axiomatically dishonest and undeserving of serious scrutiny. Today, the accelerating de-education of humanity has reached a point where the market for pseudophilosophy is vanishing; it is, as The Kids Say These Days, tl;dr . All that is left is the core proposition itself — backed up, no longer by misdirection and sophistry, but by violence.

So this tells us what anti-conservatism must be: the proposition that the law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone, and cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone.

Then the appearance arises that the task is to map “liberalism”, or “progressivism”, or “socialism”, or whateverthefuckkindofstupidnoise-ism, onto the core proposition of anti-conservatism.

No, it a’n’t. The task is to throw all those things on the exact same burn pile as the collected works of all the apologists for conservatism, and start fresh. The core proposition of anti-conservatism requires no supplementation and no exegesis. It is as sufficient as it is necessary. What you see is what you get:

The law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone; and it cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone.

https://crookedtimber.org/2018/03/21/liberals-against-progressives/#comment-729288

And the Catholics in the US are likely to get in on the action, as evidenced by the Supreme Court and the people who made that happen. There’s also a bunch of drama going on between them and the Pope.

Then remove the larger thing that creates the vacuum area. Don’t have positions of power.