• brewery@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What difficulties are you finding with it and are you switching from Google? The results are as custom as Google given they haven’t scraped your life history so wondering if that’s it? I’ve been using DDG without any issues. About once every 6 months I struggle to find something so try the Google bang but have never found better results. In fact, I was shocked last time how crap the Google results were, just full of AI generated crap and SEO based crap.

    To be honest, DDG is also struggling with that now as it’s based on Bing. I have been trying a public searxg but not found it very good so far.

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love DDG and use it as my default, but there’s no doubt that its index is shallower and its semantic matching can’t compare to Google’s. I’m a biogeochemist and spend a lot of time coding in R. Google is just better at surfacing rare science articles/blogs and stackoverflow pages where my query doesn’t match exactly, but it is a relevant result. I use DDG for my personal searching and Google for professional searching

        • george@lemmy.org.il
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          For me, it finds smaller websites that usually contain the information I need, but aren’t SEOd that well so they don’t appear on ad-driven search engines. Also the programming lens is great

      • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hell no. Paying for something that’s the same as ddg. That’s a terrible idea, and the results aren’t any better, despite how much their marketing claims it to be and that smaller blogs show up more.

          • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            In this case you actually get more for free. Not to mention the paid service is a privacy nightmare since all of the searched are done through a logged in user. Which also means it’s incompatible with private browsing. But their marketing says “trust me bro”, while they’re selling you an overrated product. DDG even simply through a VPN is a million times more private then any logged in service. You need to assume if something is trackable, it will be tracked. Don’t follow marketing blindly.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Results suck, it can’t find anything. I really don’t think it’s related to lack of browsing history.

        • Clegko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not the same person, but DDG results just seem a little bit shittier than Google’s results. It’s nothing I can specifically put my finger on, outside of “I’m having more issues finding an answer for my query”.

          I also hate the basic layout of the page, but that’s not a DDG problem as such, just a personal opinion.

          • Polar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I use DDG exclusively now, but I will say, despite the downvotes from these annoying ass FOSS users, DDG is worse.

            If I am having some very specific issue with my computer, I will be page 5 on DDG without an answer, but Google will have one page 1.

            Also Google Images is light years ahead DDG.

            It took a long time to adjust to DDG, but now I am fine with it.

            • Clegko@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If I am having some very specific issue with my computer, I will be page 5 on DDG without an answer, but Google will have one page 1.

              This has always been my number one issue, too. I’m in IT and still struggle to use DDG (and Bing, tbf) for technical issues. The results are either only vaguely related to what I’m searching for, outdated as shit, or completely irrelevant. Automotive stuff is the same. I can be ass deep in DDG results and just be getting shit on top of shit. It’s frustrating, because I want to love DDG but it makes it so hard for my general use-case.

            • Clegko@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              While that is true, you shouldn’t need to do that. The site should just work properly without diving into the advanced stuff. It’s also WAY more annoying to use on mobile.