• Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Idk about NYC, but my local library might as well rebrand to a homeless shelter. I love the concept of libraries, but if they aren’t going to throw out the homeless people using it as a place to jerk off and do drugs, then idk what to do. I personally don’t feel safe at ours, especially with my kids.

    • Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Seriously, have you considered that the same ideology that strive to choke public libraries, also the one that push people to homelessness? (At least unsheltered homelessness)

    • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Libraries are the last bastion of indoor public spaces. If you have a problem with people experiencing homelessness, do something about it. Don’t complain about the one remaining place that welcomes all people.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        If you can’t be in a library without jerking off in the shared spade, you have to go outside.

      • Apeman42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I mean, this but unironically? No one should be seeing homeless people because they shouldn’t be homeless.

        • Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          But they do exist, something systematic must be changed for then not to exist. (Public housing, maybe?)

          But until than, what?

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            There’s maybe two problems with this:

            • public housing is a part of the picture, and so are public libraries. The solution is certainly not to cut library spending just because there are homeless people using it
            • Thinking there being homeless people around is an issue that needs solving is itself pretty bigoted. Like, maybe you have a problem with people who haven’t showered for a while? or people who use the library for personal activities because there are no better places for them to do them? But ‘these people are a problem’ itself becomes problematic because you’ve consolidated those qualities you find objectionable into a class of person, and that makes it really easy to forget/misplace/dismiss the humanity those people deserve.

            It’s a common attitude, so don’t feel like i’m picking you out personally to scold. More people should be aware of how that attitude dehumanizes people experiencing shelter insecurity.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t think the words “jerking off or doing drugs” were accidental in that comment. The request isn’t to ban homeless people from being in the library respectfully.

        A rule like “no large backpacks” is bullshit, and anti-homeless. Backpacks aren’t a disruption to the library.

        A rule like “no jerking off or doing drugs” is perfectly reasonable.